LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud
User Name
Password
Linux - Virtualization and Cloud This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-08-2016, 10:28 AM   #1
zzyzxgal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2015
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Upgraded to VM then problems processing packets from cloud web server


Over the weekend we bit the bullet and transferred from our 10-year-old system to a VM setup. Yesterday things looked good until the web volume increased in the afternoon. We utilize a cloud web service (Azure).

Now, I'm not super Linux-savvy, so I hope I'll frame this question correctly.

It appears that after Microsoft sends the FIN (which closes the port/session on their end) Linux is holding onto it. Then, as we watch, MS is re-using those ports too frequently which is causing massive resets to occur. They still show as ESTABLISHED.

Our Linux wiz is convinced that we need to address that issue somehow. But, I'm wondering why it would create a problem just because we upgraded. And I'm wondering if there is somewhere in Linux that these port closures can be controlled. They should close as soon as we are notified of MS's port closure.

To add another wrinkle to the mix, we have another port that is running a similar web process and it remains unaffected. It, however is less intensive.

Also, the language we're using on this machine is BBx Pro5 Basic. This might complicate matters further because it's not exactly "web friendly". So, we may be using a rather rudimentary method.
 
Old 03-09-2016, 07:20 AM   #2
zzyzxgal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2015
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Additional info

Even though he didn't think it would help, our Linux guy changed the TimeWaits from 60 to 30. I actually thought this might work. Yesterday we didn't have the same problems we had the day before. But, then again, we didn't have the same volume of traffic to contend with.

Is there any reason to think this change might have solved the problem?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
get packets from kernel and processing them and reinject kikilinux Programming 1 04-09-2013 04:03 AM
Client/Server methods for processing session packets yaplej Programming 0 03-21-2011 05:39 PM
[SOLVED] Forward SMTP packets from web server to another machine bobby953 Linux - Networking 7 03-10-2010 10:45 AM
A question about packets on a web server... trist007 Linux - Networking 1 01-29-2009 09:04 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration