Linux - Virtualization and CloudThis forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
uname -a
Linux Jimbo 3.13.0-40-generic #69-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 13 17:53:56 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
dmesg:
vboxdrv: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
vboxdrv: Found 4 processor cores.
vboxdrv: fAsync=0 offMin=0x240 offMax=0x295c
vboxdrv: TSC mode is 'synchronous', kernel timer mode is 'normal'.
vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 4.3.18_Ubuntu (interface 0x001a0008).
vboxpci: IOMMU found
VirtualBox appears to be functioning properly but I sure don't like this error message. I've done a fair amount of searching around but I haven't found any workable solutions. There are even posts here that are over a year old with no solution. Hope someone can lend a hand on this one. I would rather stick with VirtualBox than switch to vmware.
Perhaps every secure boot (UEFI) enabled kernels have their modules signed. Perhaps the VirtualBox module doesn't has that sign or it's not signed by key.
VirtualBox appears to be functioning properly but I sure don't like this error message. I've done a fair amount of searching around but I haven't found any workable solutions. There are even posts here that are over a year old with no solution. Hope someone can lend a hand on this one. I would rather stick with VirtualBox than switch to vmware.
That message is nothing to worry about, and has absolutely NOTHING to do with secure boot or UEFI. All that means, is that you're loading a kernel module that hasn't been fully tested/integrated with the kernel you're running. This message was intended to identify conditions which may make it difficult to properly troubleshoot a kernel problem. For example, loading a proprietary module can make kernel debug output unreliable because kernel developers don't have access to the module's source code (like the nVidia or ATI proprietary drivers), and can't determine what that module may have done to the kernel. Likewise, if the kernel had previously experienced an error condition or if a serious hardware error had occurred, the debug information generated by the kernel may not be reliable.
The WORST case, is that any kernel errors you encounter will be ignored by the kernel developers, until the authors of that module have fixed it. If things are running fine, you're in good shape, and there's nothing really to worry about. This is covered with a better explanation: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documenta...ps-tracing.txt
---------- Post added 02-09-15 at 11:05 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by veerain
Perhaps every secure boot (UEFI) enabled kernels have their modules signed. Perhaps the VirtualBox module doesn't has that sign or it's not signed by key.
Wrong on both counts; please don't give people misleading or incorrect information.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.