What programs would you like to see ported to Linux?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
At this point, the only reason I use my Windoze partition is for Pinnacle Studio (14). When it comes to simple video editing (e.g., clipping the beginning or end of a video file, combining videos, etc.), Avidemux works fine. With Pinnacle Studio, I can change light settings, add video effects and add titles. I haven't found a Linux program that can do those things easily. There may be a Linux program out there that I haven't heard of yet; I'm open to suggestions.
Thanks for the reply. The Stardict website indicates that this one is no longer supported and that they have lost some of the script and it has not been worked on in several years. Several forms of Stardict and support programs are available from The Ubuntu Software center. Goldendict claims to be the successor to Stardict and is also available from The Ubuntu Software Center. It does not appear that either one is normally connect to email or a word processor as the spell check source. Also both seem too elabert and their display too extensive to be effective as a document spell checker.
Yes virtualdub is very very good I have used it on windows even
Copy protection emulation in a virtual drive... That's what I am talking about.
Nero is bloated.... I have great respect for the k3b team and I am confident they can put together a version of k3b that has all the elements of Nero and isn't too heavy.Also you would have enough reasons already known to you as to why Nero disallows disc burning and creating at the same time even with multiple cores.Anyway Nero is not the best disc burner anymore on Windows.
Yes virtualdub is very very good I have used it on windows even
Between mencoder, ffmpeg, mpgtx, mpgjoin/split, and a few other apps I can't think of right now, Linux has just about any functionality that virtualdub has, except point and click splicing of video (if that's the right term?). The problem is they are not unified into an app like VirtualDub or Super.
Quote:
Nero is bloated.... I have great respect for the k3b team and I am confident they can put together a version of k3b that has all the elements of Nero and isn't too heavy.Also you would have enough reasons already known to you as to why Nero disallows disc burning and creating at the same time even with multiple cores.Anyway Nero is not the best disc burner anymore on Windows.
Yeah, that goes to freeware CDBurnerXp, if I recall correctly?
Thanks for your reply. It showed how little I know about software. As it turns out, I have Ubuntu 10.4 which has aspell installed. I was looking for something with some more capability and I do not think I am using the same dictionary for Open Office and my email package. I need to read a description on how this is all tied together. Any suggestion?
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by irneb
I can't understand the "reasoning" behind having to have a 200MB mega-do-all program which does everything poorly. You only perform one of those tasks at any one time, especially if the program does it all-in-one (like Nero does).
It's called marketing. It's about companies (managers, CEO's) who want to make money and quality is no issue. Like some of the Linux community where Quality is first concern and time spent to get there is no issue. A blind spot.
Distribution: gentoo, debian, ubuntu live gnome 2.10
Posts: 440
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
It's called marketing. It's about companies (managers, CEO's) who want to make money and quality is no issue. Like some of the Linux community where Quality is first concern and time spent to get there is no issue. A blind spot.
jlinkels
Its always so frustrating when I read something so cynical .. and accurate. There's probably a more charitable answer: Big companies start with small simple Miminmum viable products, which are written quickly and without a great deal of concern for design. The plan is always to include maintenance and reliability features later. As the target begins to move, companies rush feature-after-feature to market in an attempt to ward off single-feature competitors, building middlewares to coordinate with strategic partners. Quality is always forces behind competitiveness, until the only think that can really compete on it's own is the companies market dominance and brand recognition.
Yes but it works at same time and when you buy CD|DVD drive Nero version comes for free together. Alternative is DeepBurner.
Not always. If there is a version of the same burner in 'OEM' (no sofware, no cable, normally sold in just a anti-static bag) format as well as 'retail pack' the OEM version is always cheaper.
Nero is seriously bloated IMO. When it was just a burner, it was good, but there days it takes almost as long to untick all the worse than useless junk nero comes with as it does to install.....
Yeah, I remember that I had to burn a DVD with a friends computer, but he didn't have a burning program installed. So we installed the Nero version that came with his computer (I think it was Nero 7 or 8), and it was a full blown install of more than 1.5GB. Just to burn a DVD, he never used the extra features. We changed that to CDBurnerXP after a while and it was perfectly fine.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.