Please help me install this program: qGo 1.5.4-r3-2
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Please help me install this program: qGo 1.5.4-r3-2
Debian 9, but I cannot find a solution to the dependency problem of the package. I am installing this package close to manually because it is not found on newer repositories. It is in the project page on sourceforge, though. I like that program, and I want to use it in all machines I use.
A few lines copied from my terminal should show you the problem where I cannot progress.
4 files were used, and they are available in separate pages:
The page you point has version 2.1.something, maintained by different developers and with different features.
The last 1.x version of that program is the version I use. Versions 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x exist, but they are like forks that discard important details that 1.5.4 has, and that make me want to use only it.
But that is not the point. Why I cannot install it anyway?
Compiling it is another option that I am trying to do, but I will open a different thread for that, for problems I find.
The source I pointed in a Debian mirror is changed for it, and I would try to use it before the source from sf.net - but I am having a few problems with that source from Debian. But I will probably open a thread in programming for these problems.
but installing the 8 year old dependencies ???
-- have fun !
I do not mind it being 8 years old. The board game played with it has more than 2 thousands, possibly more than 4 thousands!
The dependencies should not be a big problem. Some of them could be replaced by newer ones, naturally. But the path to compile this qt3 program seems harder than I ever imagined. I need help to either install it or compile it.
5 years can make sense for many softwares, but there are several exceptions. For simple examples, many command line utilities can be compiled and used with the source they had decades ago.
Installing should be fairly easy, I think. Compile is a last resource for me.
Would you help me compiling it, even with qt3? I do not know nothing about QT development, but it seem that this might be needed.
5 years can make sense for many softwares, but there are several exceptions. For simple examples, many command line utilities can be compiled and used with the source they had decades ago.
Exactly! Source code tends not to go out of date. Binaries go out of date quickly.
Quote:
Installing should be fairly easy, I think.
Not when there is a big gap in age between the program and its libraries. The simplest way to solve this kind of problem really is to build the program locally against the versions of the libraries that you already have.
Quote:
Would you help me compiling it, even with qt3? I do not know nothing about QT development, but it seem that this might be needed.
Yes, you'll need to install the qt3-dev packages. You should find them in synaptic under programming.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,518
Rep:
OK, please try out this one : qgo_1.5.4-r3-3debian9_amd64.deb https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O0K...ew?usp=sharing
... The old dependencies are included :
/usr/lib/{libpng12.so.0 <- libpng12.so.0.49.0, libqt-mt.so.3 <- libqt-mt.so.3.3.8}.
There is one issue : "No device audio found".
The application seems to work OK, but silent.
That is unbelieveable, incredible, a really great surprise!
Quote:
Originally Posted by knudfl
OK, please try out this one : qgo_1.5.4-r3-3debian9_amd64.deb https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O0K...ew?usp=sharing
... The old dependencies are included :
/usr/lib/{libpng12.so.0 <- libpng12.so.0.49.0, libqt-mt.so.3 <- libqt-mt.so.3.3.8}.
There is one issue : "No device audio found".
The application seems to work OK, but silent.
-
Wow! That is unbelieveable, incredible, a really great surprise!
I installed that package - and also saved it somewhere safe, because I imagine that file in a google drive may not stay there so much time. I just had to install libmng1 dependency, the rest was already here!
It is working great! There was a click sound for the stones we put in the board, but that is not much important.
Thank you very very very much!!! (:
How did you do it? Please share with us - all the possible details, no hurry at all for reading them. That is something I surely want to learn!
A few comments that I was about to do, but #13 appeared and #14 happened and was more important, almost urgent. (:
Below comments are for posts #9, #10, #11 and #12.
-***
@hazel:
Binaries indeed go out of date more quickly. But there are important exceptions, in my opinion. Sometimes it is not something an user will want, like me in this problem.
Current Windows runs old programs. We may need some tries, but they seem to mostly work, in the end.
qt3-dev package is not there for me. But this Debian machine is miss configured in my details. This may possibly be one more. The linux I most used was Ubuntu, and I am learning some things that I did not need to do or did not know about.
-***
@ondoho:
I have similar results as you, and I knew about them before starting this thread. And you made me smile about your apparently ironic comment - no problem with it, I will not take it as such.
Thank you for remembering what I said several posts before. It may have been crucial for this thread reaching its current status.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.