Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have both Kpackage and Synaptic, and would like to dump one to keep my system minimalist. Which do you recommend I keep? I lean toward Synaptic, simply because I am more familiar with it.
Or you can dump both Try Adept - pretty similar to Synaptic but KDE-orientated. I like both. It also depends which of these tools are well integrated with your distro. The reason that Kpackage doesn't seem to be used by that many people is that there aren't many distros that utilize it and integrate it tightly into their environment.
stress_junkie, how are Synaptic and Adept so massively different to produce such a range of feelings? (and may I note "I hate Dolphin" is so NOT on the subject)
stress_junkie, how are Synaptic and Adept so massively different to produce such a range of feelings? (and may I note "I hate Dolphin" is so NOT on the subject)
Synaptic: clean, simple interface; understandable progress messages
Adept: cluttered mysterious interface; no progress messages; no indication of what was done
The dolphin comment was tied to this dialog by way of the common theme of my preferences for similar functioning software and new versus old and the moral imperative to denounce the newer and less functional "replacement" for perfectly good original software. Moral imperative.
Well, I do love Adept's dynamic search (as opposed to Synaptic's pop-up box). What I don't like in Adept is those sliding "arrows" you have to press to see more info on a package. Synaptic is definitely better here. "no progress messages; no indication of what was done" - that's not strictly true - if you want to see console output just press "show details" button.
And for the record - I don't use any of the above - I use a wonderful combination of Yakuake and apt!
P.S. Coming back to Dolphin issue - I adore and extensively use Konqueror both in KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.1 but when it comes to straightforward file management Dolphin (the one in 4.1 not 3.5) is simply amazing! This is, however, a subject for another thread.
Adept, kpackage and synaptic are all a pain in the butt, when you go further than installing one or two package, especially the dependency handling of synaptic is totally crappy.
Use aptitude and you get a clean ncurses-Interface, incremental search and a decent dependency handling (if you turn off recommendation=dependency)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.