i just installed a stock RH8 and heard that reiserfs is cool. can i use it in my RH8?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i just installed a stock RH8 and heard that reiserfs is cool. can i use it in my RH8?
i just installed a stock RH8 and heard that reiserfs is cool. can i use it in my RH8?
what will i do?
convert all partitions except the swap to reiserFS filesystem?
how can i do that without data loss?
please help..
thanks and God bless
Well those examples are taken a little out of context I think. Most of us don't use dual P4's with 2GB ram.
If you are currently using reiserfs, there is no reason to change it. ext2 is an old filesystem with no journaling.
ext3, reiserfs, XFS etal are all journaling filesystems, which is a bonus for quick startups and better filesystem integrity.
Of course, each comes at the price of more options in your kernel, and more maintenance from you: the sysadmin.
Like I said, unless you are really interested in filesytems and want to try them out you might as well stick with reiserfs, because it's fine. I use it myself for every partition except /boot, which is ext3, just to be safe.
It says EXT2 doesnt have journaling, i don't know what that means... why does journaling make the system boot up faster, explain how journaling works.... thank you alot -- i'd like to understand!
Also is states
Code:
In this test, JFS had the best peak throughput for journal filesystems,
and ext2 had the best peak throughput for all filesystems. Reiserfs
had the lowest peak throughput, and also had the most % time in
stext_lock
So I also don't understand why you're all pro reiserfs when it had lowest peak throughput...
well.. which filesystem is the fastest for desktop use..
fastest in booting.. running simple apps like mozilla xchat gaim etc..
fastest in compiling...
any suggestions to fs that i can use instead of the fs that rh created during setup? is it ext3 or ext2? im using rh8?
Journaling filesystems have a journal in which they write what they're going to do before they do it. When in the middle of writing something they get interupted (like in a power outage), instead of taking forever to scan the disk and find any errors, they look in their journal to find out what was interupted. They are also a bit slower than non-journaling filesystems because everytime they write something they take note of it in their journal. Ext2 is faster than the rest, but if you didn't shutdown properly it takes forever to boot.
those links presented REISERFS performs slower than EXT3..
but why do you keep on using REISERFS than EXT3?
As i said, that study is a little out of context. The benchmark was performed om a dual P4, with 2gb of ram. Plus, certainly on my box I will never have up to 44 clients connecting at once..only a few webpages served once in a while, plus whatever I happen to be doing locally.
I am not really "pro-reiserfs", it just happens to be the default filesystem for the distro I use. I cetainly don't notice any lag, or delays when reading and writing files so why would I want to do something as drastic as change my entire filesystem? If your conviced by reading this that reiserfs sucks, by all means, change it to XFS or whatever...I just can't be bothered as it would be too much of a pain in the ass.
Besides, as some docs point out, JFS and XFS are not quite "ready for prime-time", so I just use one that has proven to be stable and reliable.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.