Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
01-03-2010, 08:53 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 28
Rep:
|
Flash Ridiculously Slow in Karmic
K i've been running Karmic for a month or so, (I recently switched from Mint) and I love it except that anything flash related is terribly slow. I figure it's a Karmic problem since I'm currently looking at another laptop with a slower processor and slower graphics card running windows run the flash approximately a bajillion times faster.
I am wondering if it's something do with a driver problem, or configuration, namely "EXA" to "UXA" but when I try to open xorg.conf it's completely blank.
any help on this issue would be greatly appreciated, here's my graphics card info:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30a5
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
Region 0: Memory at d0200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K]
Region 1: I/O ports at 1800 [size=8]
Region 2: Memory at c0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Region 3: Memory at d0300000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: i915
Kernel modules: i915
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 04:06 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Lewisham,London,UK
Distribution: Debian Wheezy AMD64
Posts: 87
Rep:
|
Try googling for "karmic flash slow" - there's some solutions involving adding lines to /etc/X11/xorg.conf (the X server config file) - it may not be on your system as its not there by default.
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 02:23 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 28
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yea i started there actually, and went through 5 or 6 different things to that effect, but there is not xorg.conf, so of course I googled that as well but got no solution..
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 02:26 PM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 28
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i did, however, find an install Swiftfox, which seems to make it somewhat better, though not as well as I'd like
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 02:41 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 28
Original Poster
Rep:
|
well, between swiftfox and uninstalling the adobe-flashplugin and installing flash-nonfree, it's good enough to watch YouTube, which I suppose is gonna be the best I'll get
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 03:37 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Lewisham,London,UK
Distribution: Debian Wheezy AMD64
Posts: 87
Rep:
|
If there's no xorg.conf, just create one - I think other people who had the same problem didn't have one, & they've created one that just has a couple of lines that enable an option thats not on by default. Its a fairly new thing, not having a conf file for X - but of course thats only OK if you've got a setup that'll work OK "off the peg"
An example:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1367322
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 11:13 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 28
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yea, funny story, i tried to make my own xorg.conf when i saw it wasn't there, and actually copied the line i needed from someone else that had the same problem and ended up losing my display altogether haha nothing a little recovery mode didn't fix but yea...didn't want to end up there again
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|