LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2015, 09:28 AM   #1
tnandy
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Tennessee
Distribution: Devuan 3.0 (Beowulf)
Posts: 217

Rep: Reputation: 18
Flash plugin version in Firefox doesn't match version I just updated


I keep getting the your flash is insecure and needs to be updated, click to activate flash error. I have downloaded the flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release.x86_64.rpm . Apparently, I have installed it:

Code:
# rpm -Uhv ./flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release.x86_64.rpm
Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
	package flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release.x86_64 is already installed
Note the package number ends in "491".

However, when I run Firefox 39.0 and click Tools->Add-ons->Plugins, I see:

Code:
(-) Shockwave Flash is known to be vulnerable and should be updated.  Update Now
Shockwave Flash 11.2.202.481
Shockwave Flash 11.1 r202 More
Note the package number shown in Firefox ends in "481". I tried uninstalling/reinstalling flash-plugin to no avail.

Code:
# rpm -ehv flash-plugin
Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
Cleaning up / removing...
   1:flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release################################# [100%]
# rpm -Uhv ./flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release.x86_64.rpm
Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
Updating / installing...
   1:flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release################################# [100%]
Even after restarting Firefox, the version number ends in "481" and says it needs to be updated. I don't know what else to do other than ask you kind folks.

I'd REALLY prefer to not use Google Chrome if there's any way around it.

Thanks for reading this and for any help you can provide.
 
Old 07-27-2015, 11:40 AM   #2
cepheus11
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 286

Rep: Reputation: 91
Open the url about:plugins in firefox. On that page, firefox should show the complete path to the plugin library file it is using. Example: /usr/lib64/nsbrowser/plugins/libflashplayer.so.

Check if this is the file which got installed by the package.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-27-2015, 08:51 PM   #3
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,324
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142Reputation: 6142
As far as I can tell, that "Flash is insecure" message is a standard Mozilla thing. If you use, for example, Konqueror, you likely won't get that message. I think that Mozilla is attempting to influence Adobe to clean up after itself.

Your Flash can be as updated as it can get and I think you will still get that message from a Mozilla browser.

Last edited by frankbell; 07-27-2015 at 08:52 PM.
 
Old 07-28-2015, 01:35 AM   #4
cepheus11
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 286

Rep: Reputation: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
Your Flash can be as updated as it can get and I think you will still get that message from a Mozilla browser.
No, it depends on the blocklist . As far as I know, the *491 version is not currently on mozilla's blocklist.

If firefox reports version *481, something is definitely wrong with the local installation.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-02-2015, 01:54 PM   #5
tnandy
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Tennessee
Distribution: Devuan 3.0 (Beowulf)
Posts: 217

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 18
I had previously downloaded flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release.x86_64.rpm from adobe.com. The tar.gz version did not seem to have a version number, so I didn't use that one.

I logged on as root. I opened the /home/[username]/Downloads folder. I double clicked the flash-plugin-11.2.202.491-release.x86_64.rpm and used engrampa archive manager to open the file. I double clicked on the folders "." -> "usr" -> "lib64" -> "flash-plugin". I clicked libflashplayer.so and clicked "extract". I saved the file in the root directory. I right clicked on that extracted file and clicked "copy".

Then I started Caja file manager. I double clicked "file system" -> "usr" -> "lib64" -> "flash-plugin". I right clicked in the white space and clicked "paste". It asked if I really wanted to overwrite and I said yes.

Then I started Firefox, clicked Tools -> Add-ons. Shockwave Flash now reports version 11.2.202.491 as it should.

Hopefully this has fixed the Adobe Flash problem. Thanks for all your help.

Last edited by tnandy; 08-02-2015 at 02:01 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] module ABI major version (14) doesn't match the server's version (15) dr.s Slackware 2 08-10-2014 11:45 AM
I installed the latest version of flash plugin for firefox in slackware 14.1 x64 but Patterson07 Slackware 14 02-09-2014 08:16 AM
Installed GCC version doesn't match the version the kernel was compiled with AlucardZero Linux - Software 2 02-07-2008 10:24 AM
rpmdb: Program version 4.2 doesn't match environment version jhibbets Red Hat 2 05-29-2007 09:57 PM
redhat fedora gcc version (compiled for 2.4.20) doesn't match kernel version 2.4.22 start1000 Linux - Software 0 03-16-2004 08:17 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration