Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just installed flash on a Fedora 11 system. The installer was refusing to work**, so I simply copied the plugin file to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins. Firefox typically wants its plugins in one of 2 places: /usr/lib/mozilla or /usr/lib/firefox (the latter might be an alias to /usr/bin/firefox-<version>
I don't understand why one would need to mess around with sudo on Fedora---just "su" to root......
**In one of those annoying little scenes we've all learned to dread, the installer says "enter the browser installation path" but won't recognize the normal entries. Rather than try to figure out what was in its little pea-brain, I just copied the plugin to a place I knew would work.....
I don't understand why one would need to mess around with sudo on Fedora---just "su" to root......
Hi Pix,
It's one of the quirks of a given distro that not all of us know by heart. In Ubuntu, I know, there is no root account set up by default and you have to perform certain steps to set one up. sudo seems to be set up by default on buntu. I didn't know that Fedora worked like Debian and not like Buntu.
In the future I'll avoid trying to give advice to Fedora users to avoid these problems. I think there are good reasons (security related) for using sudo sometimes rather than superuser (su) for operations such as the ones under discussion. In any event I apologise for the intrusion.
cheers,
jdk
I was the one who suggested that the OP use sudo. I didn't know Fedora didn't behave like buntu and did behave like Debian. I'm just now reading your remarks on the "sudo" thread. I'll post more on that thread. I was trying to make things as easy as possible for the OP. If you read this entire thread you'll see he is rather... inexperienced.
No harm, no foul.
cheers,
jdk
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.