FC7: Installing 'transcode' - "hal conflicts with kernel < 2.6.17"
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm running a custom kernel that was built from the kernel.org source so it does not show up using the command, but does show using the uname -a command;
$ uname -a
Linux Aspire5100 2.6.23.1 #1 Sun Nov 4 14:30:33 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Second you are running F7 so please allow yum to work and install the kernel, it would be a real good idea.
I'm running a custom kernel that was built from the kernel.org source so it does not show up using the command, but does show using the uname -a command;
$ uname -a
Linux Aspire5100 2.6.23.1 #1 Sun Nov 4 14:30:33 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Second you are running F7 so please allow yum to work and install the kernel, it would be a real good idea.
the rpm -qa 'kernel*' command showed nothing, as i mentioned previously.
# yum update kernel
fedora 100% |=========================| 2.1 kB 00:00
updates 100% |=========================| 2.3 kB 00:00
freshrpms 100% |=========================| 2.1 kB 00:00
Setting up Update Process
Could not find update match for kernel
No Packages marked for Update
Somewhere along the line that kernel was installed by a non standard method. It does not matter at this point if it was an operator error of some sort or something was randomly corrupted. The problem is that you do not know what else may have been goofed. My best advice at this point would be to do a clean install. There is no other way to know for sure that something (or a whole lot of somethings) else is goofed. My first run at linux I ended up doing three clean installs in two months due to operator errors. We learn as we go.
Somewhere along the line that kernel was installed by a non standard method. It does not matter at this point if it was an operator error of some sort or something was randomly corrupted. The problem is that you do not know what else may have been goofed. My best advice at this point would be to do a clean install. There is no other way to know for sure that something (or a whole lot of somethings) else is goofed. My first run at linux I ended up doing three clean installs in two months due to operator errors. We learn as we go.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.