Ethereal Install 0.10.0a-1 on RH9
Linux Kernal 2.4
I had originally posted this in the newbie section. I am a novice with linux so i hope this will not be out of scope reposted here. I have done various searches on the internet and on LQ.
My originbal problem was that i was getting a message on my terminal screen that went as follows.
$ethereal: Symbol "pcap_version" has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
This was not causing me any problems the program would run and the data would flow nicely into the buffer. So my original question was what was re-linking and how might i achieve that?
I figured being from a netware background that perhaps a patch might achieve the same thing so i went to ethereals website and found an rpm package which is version 0.10.0a. I have downloaded this package and issued the following commands.
su root
#rpm Uvv ethereal-0.10.0a-1.RH9.src.rpm
this generated the following report.
[root@dtbir3870 downloads]# rpm -Uvv ethereal-0.10.0a-1.RH9.src.rpm
D: ============== ethereal-0.10.0a-1.RH9.src.rpm
D: Expected size: 4390949 = lead(96)+sigs(180)+pad(4)+data(4390669)
D: Actual size: 4390949
D: ethereal-0.10.0a-1.RH9.src.rpm: MD5 digest: OK (e5fa76c2814e4602a1720ffe2dbeb6b8)
D: added source package [0]
D: found 1 source and 0 binary packages
D: Expected size: 4390949 = lead(96)+sigs(180)+pad(4)+data(4390669)
D: Actual size: 4390949
ethereal-0.10.0a-1.RH9
D: ========== Directories not explictly included in package:
D: 0 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/
D: 1 /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/
D: ==========
D: fini 100644 1 ( 0, 0) 4388176 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ethereal-0.10.0a.tar.bz2;4015100e
D: fini 100644 1 ( 0, 0) 7243 /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ethereal-net-snmp-0.10.0a.spec;4015100e
GZDIO: 537 reads, 4395824 total bytes in 0.097 secs
I then rebooted the system typed ethereal & only to find i am still running the same version 0.9.8
so i then issued the command
# rpm -ivv ethereal-0.10.0a-1.RH9.src.rpm
I get exactly the same screen as above but i still have the old version installed not the new one. i cannot seem to see any errors in the report, Again i emphasise this post perhaps should not be here as i am a complete novice. If that is the case then i appologise in advanced.
best
barry
|