Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Normally my system boots up without starting up X, but the bash prompt is displayed at a pretty low resolution (it looks like 800x600). Is there any way for me to raise the resolution of the command prompt to 1600x1200?
You can, if you want to use a framebuffer console. You'll just need to add a "vga=xxx" line to /etc/lilo.conf. However, framebuffers are pointless and a waste of resources. If you want pretty pictures, just use X.
I'm also looking for the same thing except for the resolution configuration (if any) on ttyX?
On Fedora Core(or any other RH) the resolution on tty(1,2,3..) is 720x400, it's real bad, does anyone know how to change it, cause on Mandrake it's much better?
xmnemonic, sorry for posting questions in this thread.
As spudzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz said.... vga=799
Code:
Color
depth 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
---------------+-------+-------+--------+---------+---------
8 bit | 769 771 773 775 796
15 bit | 784 787 790 793 797
16 bit | 785 788 791 794 798
24 bit | 786 789 792 795 799
Quote:
However, framebuffers are pointless and a waste of resources. If you want pretty pictures, just use X
I have to disagree with this....X is just as big a resource hog. You can have a nice slick image under your tty for very little cost without the additional overhead that X environments provide.
X is just as big a resource hog. You can have a nice slick image under your tty for very little cost without the additional overhead that X environments provide
While this is true (in fact X uses heaps more resources than a framebuffer), most people run X anyway. I just don't see the point in using a framebuffer and X at the same time. I do all my work in X, and only use the console if something goes seriously wrong. And if something does go wrong, I wouldn't trust a framebuffer console. VGA consoles are very basic, very resource friendly and very stable.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.