LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2006, 07:41 AM   #16
cthomas
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 91

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by jomen
but /dev/hda1 is not the partition wich causes the error - correct?
...and I just looked over the whole thing and saw what I (and you) should have tried in the first place:

that is a command you should have tried first
Code:
mount -n -o remount,rw /
try it now!
I did that many times and got no errors, but it is still at the same sreen. So what do I do to get it to finish booting on up into xwindows?

"but /dev/hda1 is not the partition wich causes the error - correct?" I don't know. How can you tell which one is causeing the problem>
 
Old 03-03-2006, 09:07 AM   #17
jomen
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Leipzig/Germany
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,687

Rep: Reputation: 55
Quote:
How can you tell which one is causeing the problem
I saw this line in /etc/fstab
Quote:
/dev/evms/hda1/boot / reiserfsck acl,user_xattr 1 2
1.) /dev/hda1 is your /boot partition - where the kernel and the bootloader is and I know that this is not needed for the system to function properly - it is normally not even mounted
2.) the normal boot procedure was interrupted because there was something wrong with your / (root) partition - see the error message...it is the / (slash) at the end of the message

Because of the interruption, you are placed in a single user system (to be able to correct the error) which is usually called runlevel 1
After you remounted the / partition rw and got no error you should be able to issue something like:
Code:
init 3
and your system should continue to boot normally
3 is in most linux systems the default-runlevel
You can check this with this command:
Code:
cat /etc/inittab
this will list the contents of this file
- it contains the description how init (the very first process started after boot) is supposed to bring up your system
Look for a line like this:
Code:
# Default runlevel.
id:3:initdefault:
the 3 in there is what I used in the above command to really bring up your system

Even if this works - there is still the issue: why does fsck fail everytime?!
Can knoppix see the raid-setup you have
I'm really not familiar with raid - never used it -in fact I don't even know for sure if it is raid or LVM or what exactly the difference is...
- but if knoppix sees it - you can use knoppix to check it

HINT
you might want to change the subject of the thread ( I think editing the subject of the first post does the trick ) to something like:

CHANGED:fsck fails on raid setup OES LINUX 9

to catch the attention of people who really know about this - the current title is not very precise - it was, sort of, but not anymore.
 
Old 03-03-2006, 10:20 AM   #18
cthomas
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 91

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I got it fixed!

After I made it read-write I did "shutdown -F now" and it restarted normally. To make sure it is working I shut it down and restarted it three times. Thanks for the help.

P.S.
This is a great wib site.
 
Old 03-03-2006, 12:25 PM   #19
jomen
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Leipzig/Germany
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,687

Rep: Reputation: 55
...it took quite a while - I'm glad you got it fixed!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bash: Print usage statement & exit; otherwise continue using Bash shorthand operators stefanlasiewski Programming 9 02-07-2006 05:20 PM
$LINENO can't be modified in bash 3.0, while it can be in bash 2.05b Darwish Linux - Software 1 11-07-2005 02:57 PM
bash + html + javascript or just bash ? rblampain Programming 4 12-01-2004 07:53 AM
why did bash 2.05b install delete /bin/bash & "/bin/sh -> bash"? johnpipe Linux - Software 2 06-06-2004 06:42 PM
Bash marco271 Programming 6 07-19-2003 04:30 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration