Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Not necessarily. Port-numbers (above 1024) might be used for any number of [legitimate ...] reasons. What's interesting is when a port is listening for incoming connections: if you don't know what it is or why it's doing that, then it probably should raise at least your curiosity, but it is not ipso facto cause for panic.
If the port-number is being used simply for an active connection, then ... well, for instance, "that's how routers work" (on their Internet-facing side). The port-number that's being used for a connection might have been picked more-or-less at random. Distinct connections simply need to grab a port-number (that's not on that list), and, pretty much, any port-number will do. Port-numbers basically exist to disambiguate multiple connections at the same IP-address.
A protocol will commonly use "a well-known port number" (upon which some service somewhere is listening), to negotiate the terms of a future conversation. Having agreed upon a (random ...) port-number to use, the two parties will then initiate the new conversation. Each such conversation uses its own port. When the conversation ends, the original port-number is forgotten.
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 03-17-2016 at 07:23 AM.
Mmmm... I think in this case it's actually a backdoor.
By the way, I resumed this ooooold topic - and made some necroposting - because, while searching information about this, for example here: http://www.computerworld.com/article...ur-router.html
it says this topic was left unanswered, and I could't resist.
Now, it's not unanswered anymore.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.