Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
04-19-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Real Washington
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, SuSE, UnSlung, Android
Posts: 1,819
Rep:
|
snort logging all outbound traffic as port-scan?
EDIT: After further digging, it occurs to me that configuring Snort is more like configuring Iptables than configuring Squid. I am going to have to write a conf file from scratch to fit our needs, as modifying the default snort.conf file is hopeless. God I hope it doesn't take as long as learning iptables scripting.
Revised Question:
If I use the preprocessor flow_portscan for detection of portscans, do I still need preprocessor portscan? Or does the former replace the latter in terms of functionality?
Last edited by Pcghost; 04-19-2004 at 03:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
04-20-2004, 01:45 AM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 24,804
|
If I use the preprocessor flow_portscan for detection of portscans, do I still need preprocessor portscan? Or does the former replace the latter in terms of functionality?
IIRC in Snort-2.1.x conversation, portscan and portscan2 where replaced by flow-portscan.
|
|
|
|
04-20-2004, 11:40 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Real Washington
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, SuSE, UnSlung, Android
Posts: 1,819
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Cool, thanks Unspawn. Can you suggest a good book on Snort? I see that there are a number of them, some specific to Snort and some more focused on Snort with LAMP. I intend to use Snort for long-term network intrusion detection.
|
|
|
|
04-20-2004, 01:12 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 24,804
|
Can you suggest a good book on Snort?
Soz, I can't. I usually read online docs (when I got the time that is).
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|