Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
04-19-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Arctic
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
|
snort logging all outbound traffic as port-scan?
EDIT: After further digging, it occurs to me that configuring Snort is more like configuring Iptables than configuring Squid. I am going to have to write a conf file from scratch to fit our needs, as modifying the default snort.conf file is hopeless. God I hope it doesn't take as long as learning iptables scripting.
Revised Question:
If I use the preprocessor flow_portscan for detection of portscans, do I still need preprocessor portscan? Or does the former replace the latter in terms of functionality?
Last edited by Pcghost; 04-19-2004 at 03:46 PM.
|
|
|
04-20-2004, 01:45 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
|
If I use the preprocessor flow_portscan for detection of portscans, do I still need preprocessor portscan? Or does the former replace the latter in terms of functionality?
IIRC in Snort-2.1.x conversation, portscan and portscan2 where replaced by flow-portscan.
|
|
|
04-20-2004, 11:40 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Arctic
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Cool, thanks Unspawn. Can you suggest a good book on Snort? I see that there are a number of them, some specific to Snort and some more focused on Snort with LAMP. I intend to use Snort for long-term network intrusion detection.
|
|
|
04-20-2004, 01:12 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
|
Can you suggest a good book on Snort?
Soz, I can't. I usually read online docs (when I got the time that is).
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|