Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm not certain, but if the home page entry is blank in /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow, this may be what you want. But there may be problems even if this works. Why do you want to do this? Maybe there is another way to do what it is you want to.
well, the reason I'm doing this is, I have sendmail, qpopper, and pine setup, and I don't want to use the same account for a user's shell access as his email. If I use the same account for both, and someone gets ahold of the pop password (via sniffing or something), then he could login.
That works fine, but the problem is, users who do login can't check their email with pine while they're logged in, because their email is in a different account. But if they could su to that account they could.
I'm not a mandrake club member. Actually, I should've said, I'm doing this in fedora core 2. Although, if there's a solution in mandrake, then i bet something similar would work in fedora.
Originally posted by penguin4 Rotwang; ? how or why two email progs? if needed then use seperatly with
all users, login seperately also. that may solve problem. try it.
Well, the reason I want to let users use both pine and a pop client is so they can check their email:
1. with a rich client like eudora or outlook
and
2. from anywhere by logging in (instead of having to reconfig outlook on whatever PC they're on).
Not sure what you mean by use seperately with all users login seperately.
I was trying to figure out what Rekna is talking about... but I gave up and (sort of) solved it another way:
You can config pine to load a different email box. So, for each user I create two accounts- one that can't login, which is used for email, and one that can login. The one that can login can run pine and load the other user's mailbox.
Works great except the problem is, I still have to figure out how to do permissions so that only those two user accounts and the mail group can access the mailbox. Which I think means I have to create a new group for every user too, plus add the mail user to it every time, that will be annoying..
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.