>> I didn't "brag" the RH 7.3 unpatched survival....you said it was
>> "crap" the RH 7.3 unpatched that existed would be hacked in a matter of
>> minutes. That site existed for about 3 years.
Your comment of
"RH 7.3 unpatched/not upgraded for almost 4 years and currently, he doesn't have a single problem and currently online" is what prompted my use of the word crap, bullcrap, and BS. I stand by my original position.
>> I don't want to expose the site to hackers....that site is religious
>> site...i'm a religious person also and believed in karma.
I didn't suspect you did. I was just saying that giving out the URL for a 4 year exposed server in the security forum on a site where newbies come looking for security information (and crackers come looking for newbies to prey on) might not be the best idea ...
>> Now that I give you proof...you now labeling me "bragging"...
A server answering a HTTP request doesn't mean it's not cracked every which way ...
>> The one who maintained the site is a Priest...not an Linux Admin....
>> but a simple Priest.
I understand that, but that doesn't make him impervious to the fact that his computer *IS* a "sitting duck".
>> So please next time...stop using the world "crap" against
>> anyone....unless you really know the truth or I'm I just lying.
I'm not calling you a liar. I mean you no offense at all in fact. There's a difference between being intentionally untruthful (a liar, which was my initial impression) and being incorrect without knowing any better (which I now think is the situation).
The point of what I was saying is that stories about putting an unpatched install of pretty much anything on the net for 4 years and having it completely untouched are *HIGHLY* unlikely, and usually "bullcrap".