Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
just out of curiosity.
I keep my files on a typical portable loop-AES256 encrypted file on a USB pendrive.
I was wondering, how secure is that?
I mean, what woud it takes to brute force the AES256 encryption or attack the password?
by the way the passphrase is 28 random characters.
thanks.
max
Distribution: OpenBSD 4.6, OS X 10.6.2, CentOS 4 & 5
Posts: 3,660
Rep:
Attacking the password (if it's only alpha-numeric) should have a difficulty of about 28^64, and attacking AES (assuming no flaws) should have a difficulty of, off the top of my head, at least 2^128. i.e. an attacker would have to have super computers and thousands of years. A more realistic attack would be to compromise the machine that the drive is attached to and view the contents while it's mounted (remember, mounting the drive renders the encryption useless until it's unmounted again), or to use a keylogger to capture your password.
It makes no sense to attack the most solid defense presented. Successful attacks are almost never against the strongest link in the system, they come against the weakest link and in this case the weakest link is not the crypto or the key.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.