Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I think that if Red Hat signs a deal with Microsoft then Linux has lost it's big contender. We have no one else as big as Red Hat on our side. If Red Hat signs a deal with Microsoft...it will be the start of the "Linux Civil War".
From a quick read of the article, Red Hat seems to be saying, "Let's set aside intellectual property issues (ie, your 235 bullshit patents) and talk about interoperability." I have no problem with that. The end is near only if Red Hat gives in on patents, and I didn't see any indication in the article that they will do so. Did I miss something?
Only Microsoft's general untrustworthiness. MS is still the big dog, and they won't enter any agreements without getting something in return. Right now, I imagine that "something" would be support for their OOXML (supposedly) open document format. Redhat holds a very strong hand in the networking compatibility area, but I'm sure MS is equally interested in Desktop interoperabilty, and that is a troublesome area.
I imagine that MS could set up closed-source Desktop hooks that would only work correctly for Linux companies which have signed some sort of partnership agreement. I hope Redhat steers clear for the time being, but the Redhat's and Ubuntu's of the world will have a hard time avoiding this sort of offer.
My assumption is that, in the long run MS knows it will have to move to a Unix type kernel, and is looking for technical and interface support in that area. Redhat could, indeed, offer a lot of that.
I think at this point not talking with Microsoft would be a mistake. There's nothing to be gained by sitting at the wayside and pretending nothing is going on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telemachos
From a quick read of the article, Red Hat seems to be saying, "Let's set aside intellectual property issues (ie, your 235 bullshit patents) and talk about interoperability." I have no problem with that. The end is near only if Red Hat gives in on patents, and I didn't see any indication in the article that they will do so. Did I miss something?
MS won't give up on their "intellectual property" issue - so, no deal. They're only trying a divide-and-conquer routine on the FOSS community. ++++ 'em, I say.
In any discussion with those charming chaps from Redmond, always remember those three little words so often quoted:
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.
The Microsoft attitude will not change. Their entire approach to the FOSS community reeks of this. They are trying to divide the community from the distributions. The Suse thing is a case in point, although IMO Novell are slipping further into irrelevance as each year goes by. They need the cash, and Microsoft provided some. They sold their soul though, and I think they're beginning to realise that.
The other distributions Microsoft have "bought" are too small to be of note.
Red Hat appear to be dealing with this in the right way. "We'll talk about interoperability, but until you publicly state where you're I-P problems are, you don't have any I-P problems.".
In the words of The Joker ... "Ever dance with the devil in the pale moonlight?"
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.