Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Did you say: 96 mb ram ?
It is quite low if you want to go for linux. You can manage with puppy linux or Slax , as suggested by others here. But if you really wanna go for linux in a proper way, it will be good idea to increase the configuration a bit , and then go ahead with Ubuntu initially.
Distribution: Dabble, but latest used are Fedora 13 and Ubuntu 10.4.1
Posts: 425
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEi
hi
I have an old machine that i don't use anymore and want to start learning on it. It's 400 Mhz amdk6-2, 96 mb ram.
My question is: which linux distro should i use?????
I noticed that there are a few out there and the one that cought my eye is Puppy Linux. Is there a better choice?
please help
Thank you
How much RAM can you put in? The more RAM available the more options you have. Even going from 96 to 128 meg of RAM would help, and getting up to 256 meg would allow you to run all but the most modern of distros (maybe not well, but they'd install. You still want something light)
I have an old machine that i don't use anymore and want to start learning on it. It's 400 Mhz amdk6-2, 96 mb ram.
My question is: which linux distro should i use?????
I noticed that there are a few out there and the one that cought my eye is Puppy Linux. Is there a better choice?
please help
Thank you
If you can increase the RAM then do it.
You can look at 'The LiveCD List' to choose a LiveCD to test drive and see what feels right. You should try to use the lightest environment if you intend to use 'X'.
If just to 'cli' then try 'Slackware'. With legacy hardware I would try a early version like 8.1.
These links and others can be found at 'Slackware-Links'. More than just SlackwareŽ links!
Distribution: Dabble, but latest used are Fedora 13 and Ubuntu 10.4.1
Posts: 425
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty
since thats a strange number i bet its at motherboard max
I doubt it. Motherboard max is probably 128 or 256 and someone had a 64meg stick and 32 meg stick and tossed them in. I have dollars to doughnuts that the motherboard handles at least 128 meg.
I have an old machine that i don't use anymore and want to start learning on it. It's 400 Mhz amdk6-2, 96 mb ram.
My question is: which linux distro should i use?????
I noticed that there are a few out there and the one that cought my eye is Puppy Linux. Is there a better choice?
please help
Thank you
Well I have an IBM with as close to spec as what you have. Actually I think it has 64 mb of ram. I used vector and was able to get a full boot in about 45 seconds. But I did strip alot of stuff out. But that did include a full graphical desktop.
So in short my 2 cents would be to try vector. It is based off of slackware.
Having 256MB (as you indicated) will help. However I would still stay with the lighter distro's and stay away from Ubuntu (because of your processor). If it has to be a ?buntu, try XUbuntu (Ubuntu with Xfce window manager) might be a better choice or Crunchbang (based on Ubuntu but with openbox window manager).
I did run XUbuntu 6.06 on a K6-III/450MHz with 128 MB memory and it was doable but not the fastest.
Last edited by Wim Sturkenboom; 10-10-2009 at 01:33 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.