LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-28-2008, 02:44 PM   #1
pranav.tech
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Smile Which is most suitable distro for 128mb RAM, P-IV, 1.6GHZ, PLZ SUGGEST !


Dear All,
I am fed up of my current OS due to all kinds of harmful codes (Viruses etc.). I have heard a lot about Linux based distros in different computer for short intervals.. I have tried some like knoppix, berry, ubuntu, suse, fedora, puppy, etc. Beside I love them a lot for its customizibilty, powerfulness and FOSS philosophy. I now have completely decided to be a full time Linux user. But latest ubuntu needs 300mb of RAM, Suse needs even more. I don't know abt slackware. But I need a Linux that have plenty of updates and releases all the time. I need packages to be productive and off course online community and IRC channels. I just have 128mb of DDR1 RAM (40gb hdd,1.6GHZ P-IV). PLease suggest me what should I download and burn. I also need driver for my RTL8139D Network card(China-made(possibly not original)) in that distro. Please provide solution.
Pranav Nandan
KU, Nepal

Last edited by pranav.tech; 08-28-2008 at 03:05 PM. Reason: to represent Nepal
 
Old 08-28-2008, 03:59 PM   #2
Toadbrooks
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Linux Mint 16
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 7
Not sure how much help I can be ...

If you are already pretty knowledgable with Linux, you might try one of the smaller distributions, specifically Slackware Linux, Gentoo Linux and FreeBSD. I don't know they will work, but ... maybe. There is a version of Ubuntu using the Xfe manager, which is intended for smaller, less powerful systems. It might work. For all the trouble you are going to have to go through, I'd buy 512 meg of memory. YMMV

You probably also need to check the Linux Hardware Compatibility List at http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/index.php. You network card may be listed in there. If you can find out what chip it's based on, you may be able to use a different driver, but for the same Ethernet chip.

Good luck,
Toad
 
Old 08-28-2008, 04:41 PM   #3
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian 4.0 Etch
Posts: 1,349

Rep: Reputation: 49
One option is to try Xubuntu, which is a version of Ubuntu which uses XFCE as its default desktop environment instead of GNOME.

I prefer Debian over Ubuntu; it's more stable and a bit more efficient.
 
Old 08-29-2008, 03:56 AM   #4
Toadbrooks
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Linux Mint 16
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 7
Isaac's point about Xubuntu is the one I was trying to make, but forgot the "C" in Xfce. As far as Debian, Ubuntu is based on Debian, whereas Debian has versions for 11 different processor architectures. This means the release time for new versions of the operating system can be slow. Other versions with slow release times include PCLinuxOS, MEPIS Linux, and BSD versions. (I'm not disagreeing with your point, Isaac, but the original poster said he needed rapid development releases.)

This page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/In...emRequirements gives the absolute minimum requirements for Xubuntu as:

# 166 MHz processor
# 64 MB of system memory (RAM)
# At least 1.5 GB of disk space
# VGA graphics card

Your system easily beats that. I recommend taking a close look at the section marked "Low-spec computers (Xubuntu)."
Good luck,
Toad

Last edited by Toadbrooks; 08-29-2008 at 04:03 AM.
 
Old 08-29-2008, 06:09 AM   #5
Radis
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Distribution: Ubuntu (Hardy)
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Another vote for xubuntu here - I run it on an old Sony laptop with very similar specs, except it has a P3 processor. If you can up your ram though it would be worth it, a 512mb stick should be fairly cheap. Especially as I'm not 100% sure xubuntu will allow you to install with 128mb.

Slackware is a lovely distro too and will definitely run on that machine, I currently have Slax on my pen drive to help fix other peoples machines and save data etc for them.
 
Old 08-29-2008, 09:40 AM   #6
resetreset
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: India
Distribution: Dynebolic, Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,320

Rep: Reputation: 62
could you try Dreamlinux maybe?
 
Old 08-29-2008, 09:56 AM   #7
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian 4.0 Etch
Posts: 1,349

Rep: Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toadbrooks View Post
As far as Debian, Ubuntu is based on Debian, whereas Debian has versions for 11 different processor architectures. This means the release time for new versions of the operating system can be slow. [...] (I'm not disagreeing with your point, Isaac, but the original poster said he needed rapid development releases.)
Yeah, but I didn't go into detail because it's a bit complicated. While Debian Stable tends to get out of date (albeit with very timely security updates), Debian Testing is usually on par with Ubuntu--except during the period of time of a "freeze" during testing of an upcoming Stable release. Which, of course, we've just entered with the upcoming release of Debian 5.0 Etch. And then there's Debian Unstable, which is as up to date as Ubuntu.

But in practical terms, Debian Unstable is as "unstable" as Ubuntu, so there seems to be little practical reason to choose Debian Unstable over Ubuntu. And Debian Testing? Well...that's a matter of heated debate.

That heated debate between Ubuntu vs Debian Testing is not really helpful for a newbie, of course. The bottom line is that Ubuntu and Debian are more similar to each other than either are to any non-Debian based OS, and either makes a good choice.

My usual reason for recommending Ubuntu rather than Debian for a newbie is that unlike Debian, Ubuntu's default install CD is also a LiveCD. That's useful for system recovery in general.
 
Old 08-29-2008, 11:38 AM   #8
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,140
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Two more to consider: Zenwalk and Vector.
 
Old 08-29-2008, 11:50 AM   #9
amani
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Kolkata, India
Distribution: 64-bit GNU/Linux, Kubuntu64, Fedora QA, Slackware,
Posts: 2,758

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Your network card should work automatically in any Linux.

You can try vectorLinux or Xubuntu or antiX-M7.5. But consider getting more RAM...it is easy to put them in
 
Old 08-30-2008, 02:11 AM   #10
Toadbrooks
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Linux Mint 16
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacKuo View Post
While Debian Stable tends to get out of date (albeit with very timely security updates), Debian Testing is usually on par with Ubuntu...
Thank you for the information. I've been using Ubuntu less than 5 weeks, and I'm not up-to-date on the various version wars.

As long as we are mentioning small versions of Linux, DamnSmallLinux is worth considering. However my research seems to indicate these obscure and tiny versions don't have a large user base or easy-to-find help for the newbie. I think several of the versions mentioned by others fall into this category - great if you are really good with Linux, but not so good if you aren't a pro.

Anyway, hopefully there are enough ideas above to all the original poster to do his research and pick something that will work for him. Again, for the price and trouble, no single suggestion beats getting more memory for ease of application and general usefulness.

Best of luck,
Toad
 
Old 08-30-2008, 02:46 PM   #11
pranav.tech
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Post Xubuntu

Thanks everyone,
From all your valuable sujjestions, I found many choices. By the time, I increase my memory to more 1gb, I will be trying xubuntu. Is there any fast sites you know for the iso ? Anyway I will also be watching slackware and vector.
 
Old 08-31-2008, 01:55 AM   #12
Toadbrooks
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Linux Mint 16
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by pranav.tech View Post
Thanks everyone,
Is there any fast sites you know for the iso ?
http://www.xubuntu.com/get has a list of mirrors.

Regards,
Toad

Last edited by Toadbrooks; 08-31-2008 at 01:57 AM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
limited, memory, xubuntu


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decent Distro for PPC G3 mac 128mb of ram Utsukushii Akumu Linux - Newbie 3 05-25-2008 12:25 AM
looking for a distro to run on p4 1.3 with only 128mb ram wabbalee Linux - Newbie 5 01-01-2008 02:14 AM
What's The Best Livecd Distro For Use With 128mb Ram? Ben Cook2 Linux - Distributions 2 08-04-2006 06:34 AM
Which distro is good for me plz suggest ! altainta Linux - Distributions 5 04-09-2006 02:42 PM
Good Distro for 450mhz 128MB Ram???? rm6990 Linux - Hardware 5 08-16-2004 02:11 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration