Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2007, 10:23 PM   #1
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Debian 4
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 15
Which audio player in Linux?

I thought I will never ever use anything else than Winamp. It seems though I will have to look for a replacement as there is no Winamp for Linux (there is one old version but users report too many problems with that to be worth trying...).
What program is best close to Winamp that I could use in Linux ?
Old 04-29-2007, 10:30 PM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 130Reputation: 130
I would say XMMS.
Old 04-29-2007, 10:31 PM   #3
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: F10 (x86_64)
Posts: 549

Rep: Reputation: 31
This has been asked countless times. Use your search engine to find out.
Old 04-29-2007, 11:11 PM   #4
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: Debian: Squeeze AMD64
Posts: 318

Rep: Reputation: 31
definatly XMMS. I think you can even use Winamp themes?
Old 04-30-2007, 04:37 AM   #5
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, RHEL, OpenBSD
Posts: 1,006

Rep: Reputation: 36
XMMS is not maintained anymore AFAIK so I'd suggest Audacious as it has the Winamp look as XMMS but it's more modern.
Old 04-30-2007, 04:55 AM   #6
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: India
Distribution: suse10.2
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 15
ya i too suggest XMMS, it is the best player, you will find RPMS..
Old 04-30-2007, 06:07 AM   #7
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ontario Canada
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
For streaming try some of the suggestions in this thread:

I still miss Winamp too!

Old 04-30-2007, 06:44 AM   #8
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 337

Rep: Reputation: 30
The last stable XMMS release was in 2004. It's not even part of Gentoo anymore. Go for Audacious.

P.S.: Do you insist on having an XMMS look-alike? Why not give something like Amarok/Quod Libet/whatever a try? Or heck .. try one of the CLI ones .. CMus always seemed cool to me.
Old 04-30-2007, 07:14 AM   #9
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Romania
Distribution: Suse 12.0, Slackware 12.1, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo
Posts: 301

Rep: Reputation: 30
XMMS is the closest to Winamp that I've seen so far.
But I would recommend you try out amaroK as well, while you're at it. I was thinking as well that I'd never want anything else except Winamp back in my windoze days. Now, I think I'll never want anything except amarok
Old 04-30-2007, 07:34 AM   #10
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.10
Posts: 1,142

Rep: Reputation: 49
I used windamp in windows too, then I found out how awesome amarok is - especially with the resume and search features - I turn on my pc and it starts playing stuff. I have recently switched to banshee, because I love the "recommended artists" - and online information stuff (it connects to and searches for similiar artists - and you can listen to them through podcast if you want). And my ipod stopped working with amarok recently, and I have to use gtkpod. I think the new version of banshee should be able to handle ipods too, but I haven't tried.
Old 04-30-2007, 07:38 AM   #11
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: (X)Ubuntu 10.04/10.10, Debian 5, CentOS 5
Posts: 900

Rep: Reputation: 32
Amarok and Rhythmbox are pretty good as media library type players. Rhythmbox is the most like iTunes, if you're a fan of that. If you're after a Winamp clone, I strongly recommend you ignore XMMS and just use Audacious. It's a far nicer written and better looking player in my opinion.
Old 04-30-2007, 10:00 AM   #12
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Arch - Latest
Posts: 1,522

Rep: Reputation: 45
Whenever i need software to do a task as popular as that i look at the Member choice awards:

It's a whole lot easier than everyone posting "i like x, i like y" pick the most popular and give it a try, if not, move onto the next
Old 04-30-2007, 05:31 PM   #13
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Debian 4
Posts: 132

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks everyone... and in particular for "Member choice awards" tip
Old 04-30-2007, 06:07 PM   #14
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo x86_64; Gentoo PPC; FreeBSD; OS X 10.9.4
Posts: 3,760
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 78
Sorry to take this somewhat offtopic, but it seems the OP got his/her answer so...

I strongly recommend you ignore XMMS and just use Audacious. It's a far nicer written and better looking player in my opinion.
Everybody says this. Everyone says "xmms is old and busted, audacious is the new hotness". Well sir, after Gentoo yanked xmms out from under me, I tried Audacious. I hate it. Is there something wrong with me?

It is bloody slow, and constantly freezes on me whenever I scroll the playlist and it reads the meta-tags to display. It often crashes on me. Why does the current version of audacious underperform a crufty old version of xmms from 2004? WTF!?

And yes, I have tried others like Amarok as well, but they are even worse. I do not need a full-screen app to play Oggs. I do not need an app that organizes my music. I have written python scripts that organize my music and create playlists.

Truly, I just wish someone would step up and take over maintaining xmms. It is perfect at what it does. I hate audacious so much I just removed xmms from my world file (so portage doesn't complain) but left xmms installed, so I can clandestinely use it..

Sorry, I'll stop ranting now.
Old 05-01-2007, 12:29 AM   #15
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 337

Rep: Reputation: 30
@ bulliver: Well perhaps the reason people are saying "XMMS is old" is because it really is. Audacious has a similar look, so that's why *I* have recommended it. I used it, on various Window Managers and Desktop environments and did not experience the problems you were talking about (perhaps using ~x86? ). As for Amarok.. it's even worse? Says who? You? And why does that matter to anyone else but you? Some people enjoy it's features, and I am one of them. I use Amarok together with XFCE and have used it together with wm2 (how's that for a combination of lightweight+heavyweight?). I like my files being organized, I like my collection automatically updated, I like the lyrics search features, etc. etc. etc. If you are desperate for something which will simply let you play music .. why are you even going for XMMS? That's complete bloat compared to mpg123/cmus/etc.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to change the default audio / video player in linux thinknologist Linux - Software 3 04-13-2007 12:48 AM
What is the preferred music/audio player in Linux? M$ISBS Linux - Software 13 04-09-2007 05:57 AM
LXer: My quest for a Linux audio player LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-06-2006 02:54 PM
Linux mp3 player / car audio phillhw Linux - General 2 09-27-2001 03:49 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration