Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello
I bought a used ASUS EEE PC 1101HA netbook, equipped with Intel Atom Z520 processor, Intel GMA 500 graphics card,
2 GB memory, 250 GB HDD, with Windows 7 Home Premium.
It is very slow, I would only use it to surf the internet while traveling and on vacation; it's already a problem to browse: with Firefox (1 open tab) it takes up 100% of the CPU (no memory problem); with light browsers (Qtweb) I don't read mail ...
Now I was thinking of putting Linux in DUAL-BOOT, but I'm confused.
Years ago on my old notebook I had tried Mint (good graphics, stable), Zorin (which they say is the most similar to Windows, but blurry graphics, I didn't like it) and Puppy (lightning turning on RAM, but minimal).
Now reading around, I see that Mint has problems on Youtube videos, Puppy has hardware configuration problems, Lubuntu that many advise does not include dual-booting ...
I would like a light distro with firefox, desktop similar to windows, and some accessory functions, with dual-boot.
I await advice.
Thanks for the answers.
I used Mint for almost the exact same machine for years. Didn't dual boot. It wasn't slow at all. There are also more distributions which are far lighter weight than Mint.
Your Asus EEE 1101HA netbook is not a good candidate for Linux, sorry. The GMA 500 chipset is known to have bad Linux compatibility and poor multimedia performance for videos and games.
I recommend to continue using Windows 7. EEE 1101HA is old and slow hardware, so surfing the web will be a frustrating experience, I'm afraid.
Here is a list of hardware with good Ubuntu Linux compatibility. (Mint is based on Ubuntu, so these laptops should also run Mint very well.) I recommend to save up for something on this list: https://certification.ubuntu.com/desktop/
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Sadly, I tend to agree with snowpine's conclusion. I ran Linux on an older EE machine a few years ago and the web and YouTube were starting to get difficult. I have what is basically a Chromebook with a Celeron and a few gigs of RAM and Intel graphics and it's definately struggling with YouTube and more modern websites.
Well mine was an Azus and I think it was a Z530. Fact was that the hard drive died, so I booted it using Mint Live from a thumbstick the whole time. I forget if it was Debian Edition, and I also forget if I used MATE. I had no problems with it. I used it for web surfing, but not sure if I viewed much Youtube. I take that back, I didn't use it much for Youtube mainly because I never really viewed much streaming video at all, then or now. But it worked, WiFi and all, nothing slow about it. I used the DE all the time, not command line.
Sounds as if hector56 has already tried this though.
All I would suggest is to make sure they have a 32-bit distribution as well as see if they can upgrade the RAM by finding some spare RAM somewhere else. I may have upgraded mine to 4G.
Sadly, I tend to agree with snowpine's conclusion. I ran Linux on an older EE machine a few years ago and the web and YouTube were starting to get difficult. I have what is basically a Chromebook with a Celeron and a few gigs of RAM and Intel graphics and it's definately struggling with YouTube and more modern websites.
Generally speaking, I enjoy the hobby of running Linux on old hardware. So long as our expectations are realistic, it can be fun to use open-source software to resurrect old dinosaur computers.
However, the GMA 500 had specific issues with Linux. While it was an "Intel" chipset in name, in actual practice, this chipset was never supported by the open-source Intel drivers. Usually, Intel graphics are very well-supported in Linux, but GMA 500 "Poulsbo" was a rare exception.
Thanks for the answers, in particular Snowpine. Patience, I will have to keep win and the slowness. In fact I had read in another forum to look for a distro compatible with the emgd drivers for the GMA 500 video card. I could not install them even in windows ... All too complicated.
Yes, installing any Linux distro is not going to speed it up. Certain apps will make it faster, e.g. using a dedicated Youtube client instead of a browser. I have a netbook which runs 32bit Slackware but I'm phasing it out. It's OK for emails and listening to music but I probably wouldn't do serious work on it anymore. Even Quake struggles to run on it.
The poulsbo reference makes me take back my comment about Mint Debian Edition. What I used was definitely Ubuntu derived because they did at one point get the poulsbo driver working. Looks like it was Ubuntu 12.04. Not saying that you absolutely should continue to try, just noting that I did an ATOM SBC device and we had the exact problem that the Intel bridge chip with the custom graphics component was a moderate to major problem until we got a distro to work for it. Our problem was that we didn't wish to use Ubuntu and chose a purchased embedded Linux. As part of that purchase, they provided professional services to get the graphics driver working with their distro. They obviously started with the one from Ubuntu. They actually got the graphics working pretty fast, but we required a screen rotation which gave them far more grief. You may wish to try 12.04 or similar, and check if 14, 16, or 18 have carried forward that driver, probably not. Either case, if you find that it doesn't perform, then that's the issue plain and simple. Update RAM and stick with Win7.
I hope you noticed that there was a link in my question, clicked on it and read it.
It's old, but the situation has not improved in any way (read: nobody's been working on it for a decade).
The gist is this:
Don't wake the dead.
If you live in a so-called western country you can probably afford to get something similarly specced, but with MUCH better Linux support for very, very little (or no) money.
If you are ready to run a really outdated Ubuntu version that should never, ever connect to the internet, it seems that "Ubuntu Netbook Remix" is your keyword.
Conclusion
That's it. After these two changes, my Asus eeePC is 99% configured, with (almost) full hardware compatibility. Apart from the battery indicator, everything works tiptop now, and the fans are doing their job in evacuating excess heat from inside the netbook chassis. The little machine is back in action, modern and relevant, with good performance and no hardware issues. Plus, we learned a few new things today.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.