Asus EEE PC 900 the regular distro vs an eee distro
Linux - GeneralThis forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I recently purchased an Asus eee pc 900. The hardware is excellent, but the default xandros OS is less to be desire.
There are some eee type distros of the popular distros like eeexubuntu eeepupp etc...but I'll rather use the regular distros, so my question is has anyone run into problems using the regular distro versus an eee type distro?
An eetype distro will be customised for it. So it will be a better choice. Of course if you install a regular distro, then you will need to adjust a lot of things incl the small screen. You will be better off using a custom kernel as most of the i386 types are optimised for P4+.
A regular distro installation might install a swap partition, and might not mount the partitions with the correct options, such as noatime. An eeepc distro will also do things like use the unionfs to cache writes. A solid state drive has a limited number of writes, so you don't want to simply install a normal OS on an eeepc.
By the way, I was unaware of a program called unetbootin. It's a USB installer and it runs in linux. You have to chmod +x to make it execuable. It takes an ISO image and writes it to an USB drive so you can boot off it. It was created for ubuntu, but the tutorials said it can be use to create other distros as pen drives.
I have a 701 eee-pc, and I don't see why I would want to install a regular distro. The default xandros has worked very well so far, and it seems to be near 100% compatible with debian, so there's no shortage of software either.
I didn't even change to 'advanced' mode (a kde-like ice-wm instead of the tab system)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.