Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by Baldrick65 This is really strange for a fat32 drive. Have you used any 3rd party encryption utils in windows that may be causing problems? You could also try creating another directory in Windows (or better still from Linux: mkdir /mnt/win/musicfiles as a normal user) and moving all your mp3's to there.
HTH Baldrick
It's not strange: it tryes to chmod 755, but since there is a single readonly flag and not one for each u, g and o, it fails, setting permissions to 777 (which is actually what he was trying to acheve)
What I thought was strange is: dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 32768 Oct 26 15:14 Music mp3 the output from ls -l /mnt/win lists the dir as no write access. As you point out, it is usual for a fat32 drive to be "777", hence my question about 3rd party utils.
If i remember well from msdos time, fat has 4 flags: hidden, system, readonly, and archive (that is, changed since last backup)
Most are ignored under linux (some under win as well), but readonly is mapped to the write permissions (i've been knowing this a whole half a day now )
I am probably pushing my luck, I thought this would be the easy part.
I right click on the music mp3 folder and select "make link" and I get an error
"Operation not permitted" while creating a link to "/mnt/win/music mp3"
Any suggestions ?
Once I had got the link I would have dragged it onto the "desk top"
You can't create links on a fat filesystem, it's not supported by kernel.
Note this is true for a native win system, too: mswin shortcuts are not at system level, they don't work trasparently on EVERY application: it's the application itself that cares about them.
As a curiosity, under linux you can add unix-like behavior to a fat filesystem mounting it as umsdos (unix-on-msdos), but it's terribly slow
Also note that even if you can't place a link ON a vfat, you can have a (soft) link pointing TO a vfat, like any other filesystem point.
Back to your problem, you can drag the folder to your desktop while holding ctrl+shift.
What i did on my own system is actually making a link in my ~ (/home/ale):
ln -s /mnt/data1/mp3 ~/mp3
Or you can do (from your home)
mkdir mp3
ln -s /mnt/win/Music\ mp3/* ~/mp3
This way, if you run out of space and move /mnt/win/Music\ mp3/Lennon to another disk, simply change the corresponding symlink and you'll still have it in ~/mp3/Lennon among others !
Links give linux a boost in flexibility, on home desktops awa on large university networks. Once you get familair with them you won't live without.
Refer to ln man page
I hope you have a very good Christmas. (Chances are that I will be asking for more help shortly). I am going to try and load WINE so I can use a couple of Windows programs I really can't live without.
I'm glad I was able to help you. And also, thanks to the other guys, I've learned a lot from this thread.
I have Fedora Core 1 and I downloaded the rpm to install the kernel module to allow me to mount my ntfs drive but I couldn't get it to install properly. I haven't actually had enough time to try it though (exam week) but I'll get to it this weekend.
Someone mentioned: Why run WinXP still?
Well, to be honest, I love Linux so far (i like challenges and things that make me think) but Windows still has a nicer GUI (i can't get gdesklets to run properly either.. I think it's somethin with Fedora because I tried it on 2 different machines and I followed instructions and all but it doesn't work), but aside from that, I think Linux rocks. It is truly amazing :-) it never crashes! and there's no need to restart it after every install!
Thanks and best wishes to all,
Pandasonic
I love the penguin. But my heart stays with the Pandas.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.