Reason for ABORT chunk in response to INIT (over SCTP protocol) not known

		LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
Reason for ABORT chunk in response to INIT (over SCTP protocol) not known

Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.

Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.

Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.

Search this Thread

08-19-2011, 07:44 AM	#1
harism LQ Newbie Registered: Aug 2011 Posts: 1 Rep:	Reason for ABORT chunk in response to INIT (over SCTP protocol) not known Hi All, Can any one attempt to answer my question ? My peer-1 (Linux, 2.6.34-12, SMP PREEMPT) initiates INIT to the peer-2 (SunOS-10). peer-2 responds with ABORT(no Error causes !!) I see in INIT there is an optional chunk (Forward-TSN-Supported parameter, as per RFC 2960 [2]) which of course is obsolete as per RFC-4960. Is it possible that this could be the reason ? Please enlighten me with whatever ample ideas you have. Waiting !! Thanks, Harish M

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
project on secure stream control transmission protocol(SCTP)	monindra	Fedora - Installation	2	01-21-2021 10:51 PM
how to re-initialize the SCTP protocol using ns2?	askerwhat	Linux - Networking	0	07-25-2011 04:22 PM
Will NFS using SCTP as transport layer protocol , improve its performance ?	Vedavyasa	Linux - Networking	1	12-03-2010 07:57 PM
Develop chat program using SCTP protocol	phase_ram	Linux - Networking	7	05-19-2010 07:44 PM
SCTP protocol Cwnd Mesurment	Joe1989	Linux - Networking	1	04-07-2010 06:28 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.

Main Menu

(Con't)

My LQ

Write for LQ

LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.

Main Menu

Syndicate

Latest Threads

LQ News

Twitter: @linuxquestions