Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm sorry, the full result of the command is as under
Linux inkit 2.6.35-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Sun Sep 19 20:34:50 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
I did not include the whole line because when I checked around in google, I found that SMP was automatically enabled in all kernels after 2.2.8 or 9 or something like that.
I ran the dmesg command sygOO, but everything I get is what appears to be the firewall audit details and has similar details to what will be displayed on firestarter under edit. there does not seem to be anything else other than that, and I don't know if I should be looking into the internet connection report. Please let me know if there is something else that I can try.
The simplest way would probably be to remove the heat sink and take a look at the processor inside, but considering that the pins are a little tight, I don't want to force it and screw up a perfectly good system just because of some fancy of mine.
Thanks everyone for your time, and I appreciate your help.
Distribution: Cinnamon Mint 20.1 (Laptop) and 20.2 (Desktop)
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
You could try downloading a differnt Live CD; Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva or whatever. Run it up and do
Code:
cat /proc/cpuinfo
again.
Just a thoght... All a bit strange. Removing the CPU to look at a load of pins? I reckon that's a pretty long shot. A bent/broken pin would probably have given a more terminal outcome, dropping a core? Highly improbable.
Hi Soadyheid, I understand what you mean. I got an answer in another forum that sometimes hyperthreaded cpu's show up as a dual core in xp which may answer my question in that XP showed that my processor was a dual core, but linux shows only a single core. What do you think?
Distribution: Cinnamon Mint 20.1 (Laptop) and 20.2 (Desktop)
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
Quote:
I got an answer in another forum that sometimes hyperthreaded cpu's show up as a dual core in xp which may answer my question in that XP showed that my processor was a dual core, but linux shows only a single core. What do you think?
Hyperthreading shows as an extra core in Linux as well, in fact at one time Windows systems couldn't handle multiple cores/hyperthreading (W'98 I think) while Linux could!
I'm guessing that the HT=y and SMT=y means that my version of linux supports both hyperthreading and dual cores (can't connect MC with anything in my mind). Does that mean that my cpu is really a single core? Is it possible that a single core can show up as a dual core on XP for any reason?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.