Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I couldn't disagree with this more; the "upstream vendor" (Red Hat) routinely backports the latest hardware support to the kernel to the point it really isn't 2.6.18 at all but rather a mutant super-kernel. My experience with CentOS 5.x as a workstation operating system has been overwhelmingly positive, even on my Dell Mini netbook.
Also as I'm sure you know, there will be a new Red Hat/CentOS release later this year that has 2.6.32 and all the latest "stuff." (You can test-drive the Beta today if you like!)
"CentOS does not support any hardware" is a ludicrous statement.
Yeah, I know. But I would rather have the latest support/kernel and latest GNOME all the time, which is why I would go with Fedora if I wanted something like RH. But it's your choice.
Edit: Oh, and will the new Red Hat/CentOS come with GTK3 (GTK+ 2.90)? If not, will the required build dependencies be in the CentOS repository to be able to git clone GTK3 and build it?
Code:
git clone git://git.gnome.org/gtk+ gtk3
Last edited by Kenny_Strawn; 08-15-2010 at 03:36 PM.
I love how these "which distro for a beginner" questions turn out to be a discussion of linux veterans discussing which distro is better for them instead of actually helping the beginner.
I love how these "which distro for a beginner" questions turn out to be a discussion of linux veterans discussing which distro is better for them instead of actually helping the beginner.
Slackware?!?! It's not for newbies, and for Windows users is one of the hardest distros to learn, as you have to type commands just to get Internet working (and if you want to get wireless working using net-config, good luck).
Considering that this particular newbie is about to go to college for IT, this might be exactly the kind of experience he would benefit from. Slackware also gives you an extremely well-tested stock install, and makes it as easy as possible to a) change every aspect of it, and b) revert to it when you break stuff experimenting. I certainly benefited from that as as newbie.
And btw, you don't use net-config to get wireless working in Slackware. You just install wicd and use its GUI .
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL
Try a few for a few days each, then settle for the one you like best. That's the only way to choose.
It takes more than a few days to really get a feel for any distro. Two weeks would be a minimum, imho.
I mean, we all react the same way when people start threads saying "I tried your favorite distro for a few days and these are the reasons I don't like it."
The best method for partitioning on Windows 7 is...
Click on start, right click on Computer, and select Manage
Go to Storage > Disk Management in the mmc
Right click on your drive and select Shrink Volume...
NOTE: It's better to defrag and optimize your drive using a utility such as MyDefrag because Disk Management will only shrink the volume down to the nearest fragment. Which is why shrinking a fragmented volume will produce undesirable results.
After that install any aforementioned XYZ distro and they all usually detect Windows and setup grub accordingly. If you run into troubles we're here to help you either fix it or assist you with restoring your computer the way you want it.
Adding to sag47's sage advice, I recommend installing your Linux bootloader to the front of the partition and not to the MBR. Then you can use a Windows program called EasyBCD to handle the dual-booting. This is the easiest setup, imho.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.