LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2004, 08:32 PM   #1
stolenpants
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
picking linux distro for samba


I've been out of the linux server game for a couple years, and they have a new version of samba I really want to try, so I have a couple questions.

I want to pick a linux distro that is a bare minimum size. All I want to run on it is SAMBA as a windows domain controller, file server, DNS server perhaps, kerio mail server 6, and webmin. I don't think I want any kind of GUI on it, I don't ever plan on sitting in front of it with a monitor/keyboard, just webmin and ssh or telnet or whatever. Kerio mail server says it's tested with redhat 9 and suse 9.x but I'm pretty sure it will run on pretty much anything.

Also, here's a question for the linux masses: last time I had worked with samba, I came across a limitation of linux. When duplicating files between servers (offsite backups) between windows and linux, the file permissions became a problem. But I started thinking: I read that linux can support NTFS now. Is that true? If so could I run my samba shares off of an NTFS drive and not have to worry about permissions?

I'm really ignorant in general on this stuff because I haven't done it in so long, but I will probably be getting back up to speed quick, even quicker with good forum help. Thanks.
 
Old 10-04-2004, 10:03 PM   #2
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
Hey!

Samba 3 is great... Linux has great support for reading from NTFS drives, but writing is still very riskae at best...

I would recommend Slackware for a bare minumum Samba server... I know everyone says slackware is uber difficult and blah blah blah... but...

Slackware 10 is the first distro I've ever gotten Samba working on the way I wanted... and it was quite easy at that.. I dunno what the issues with the others were.. INCLUDING RED HAT 9 AND SUSE 9.0/9.1

So there's a thought... and Slackware is about THE MOST stable distro out there... good luck
 
Old 10-04-2004, 10:10 PM   #3
stolenpants
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Actually I just started downloading slackware.

I had just installed mandrake but for some reason it would not boot in anything but failsafe mode.

I didn't really want to use suse because it's a personal edition meant for desktops, looking at the packages in the installer made me nervous.

I'm tempted by fedora but isn't it basically a beta system now? Is it ever finished? Does anyone think that fedora would make a good samba/mail server where security and stability is a priority?

I think eventually I will do Linux From Scratch (LFS) but that day is in the distant future.
 
Old 10-07-2004, 08:30 PM   #4
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
Good good... You'll like slack once you get the hang of it...

Suse is good if you use Professiona edition... I always buy SuSE... Professional Edition at Best Buy is like $90... It's a great OS but if you don't want to runa gui you won't notice much difference at all...

Fedora is okay... i liked it when i used it.. and I didn't really have any problems with it... I just kind of grew away from it... I don't really know why...

Good luck though..
 
Old 10-12-2004, 08:12 PM   #5
karlan
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 158

Rep: Reputation: 30
Slackware 10 is great, its what i'm on right now. Once you can fine tune your Slackware distro you:
1) Become a true linux geek, "everyone asks Slackware users for help"
2) Realize how easy it is to configure a linux system exactly how you want it

Last edited by karlan; 10-12-2004 at 08:13 PM.
 
Old 10-17-2004, 09:11 AM   #6
peter_b_19
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
e-Smith SME Server

I am fairly new to *nix systmes apart from using an IP-COP machine and playing with that abit and doing a little programming on Sun Systems when doing It at unit however recently have been employed in property and can't believe what people pay for windows file servers /PDC that don't work and need a good reboot every few days. At home(parents small business) a PDC was never needed, but seeing the situation at work i went searching and had the same problems as everyone else with the major distros ie. redhat/suse/ the list goes on in the past, so i thought about the novel approach of turning my ipcop box into a file server/pdc by loading smaba. When doing a little research and deciding it would not be a secure thing to do given my experience, i was about to give up again when ....

I found "SME server" by E-smith. (http://contribs.org/)

The are up to version 6.0.1 and is 5 year + tested distro (light weight 345mb iso) and out of box supports software raid mirror with pretty much any two harddrives, or you can use hardware raid.

Features: - https admin and text based console admin + ssh (light weight no x system) but only installed with samba 2.2.8a. However, out of box however worked fine for me as PDC/file/Print server with xp pro clients and roaming profiles but only found it a couple of days ago still giving it a good bashing.

Best of all, I just poped the cd in, and without any problems i had it working on my AMD XP2000+ 512MB file server (just put in a new hdd for the install) and BOOM!. No probs no fuss. It will run on min requiremetns and acts as full firewall gateway/routher/dhcp/dns/file server with ftps remote access/full mail server with Basic user managment but very customizable and scaleable.

I think for a single "Server" system for 3 - 100+ systems, SME server is most certinally worth a try in my opinion but out of the box aimed at SOHO users with some mods, could do what ever you want as based on RedHat 7.

Thats my 2 cents.
Peter Britten.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Picking a new distro SolidSnakeX28 Linux - General 13 09-08-2005 08:23 PM
Need help on picking distro linuxputz Linux - Laptop and Netbook 5 09-02-2004 01:25 PM
picking a distro ? YBA^[x] Linux - Distributions 11 08-02-2004 12:31 PM
need help picking distro kurt9090 Linux - Distributions 10 05-03-2004 01:57 AM
Picking a lightweight distro michaelgp Linux - Distributions 3 02-24-2004 06:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration