Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am once again forced into using linux due to the fact that my Windows OS crashed and burned. There is nothing intuitive about linux but anyways... I installed a program(smplayer) and it's installed. I had to google to find out how to find that program. I found it in software center. That didn't hel;p at all. What (censored) reated that? It showed the program but there is no way to run the program from that list. Would it be so hard to also include a way to run programs from that list? Please help.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
If you're using Ubuntu then you likely won't have a menu you can easily access so, to open smplayer you would need to hit the button on the top right of the screen and type smplayer to search for it.
If you would rather have a "start menu" type setup then you might want to install LXDE or XFCE (or even KDE) and use that instead of Ubuntu's default of Unity.
Actually, there's nothing intuitive about Windows: you've just forgotten the days when you were learning it!
Seriously, I don't think Ubuntu's unity interface is likely to please someone used to Windows, or anything else other than a smart-phone. Mint with the Mate GUI would be more intuitive: at least you'd have a menu/start button.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann
Actually, there's nothing intuitive about Windows: you've just forgotten the days when you were learning it!
You are right, of course, however one thing that Windows used to be (until 8) and Linux DEs other than Gnome Shell and Unity tend to be is discoverable. By that I mean one can find almost anything program-wise by simply clicking and exploring. What Windows 8 and Unity do is hide everything meaning that nothing is discoverable making them far harder to come to terms with.
To my mind this is why the familiar "desktop paradigm" has lived so long -- anything can be found by somebody by exploring.
I happen to be using FreeBSD tonight. In Linux, the path would have been /usr/bin/konqueror. If the target directory is in your PATH statement, "konqueror" would have been enough to launch the program; you would not have had to specify the path-to-konqueror.
For this usage, I prefer "whereis" to "locate," as whereis returns only executable files.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.