Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-20-2002, 10:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 11
Rep:
|
fips, less space than windows claims, no hidden files?
hey all, i'm using fips to split the windows partition and, acorrding to windows, i have 700mb of free space. but fips only offers 200mb if i'm reading this correctly. as the doc said, i searched in dos for hidden files (typing 'dir c:h/s' and 'dir c:s/s') but nothing came up.
i'm wondering if there is a relationship between cylinders and mb's that i'm not aware of (making 200mb reasonable) or i'm not searching for hidden files correctly. thanks in advance 
|
|
|
|
06-21-2002, 07:35 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,154
Rep:
|
it may be the position on the disk of the fragment that is farthest into the disk.
free space may be there for windows, but not all at the end of the disk.
|
|
|
|
06-21-2002, 07:45 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Shanghai, CHINA
Distribution: RH 5.0,5.1 6.0,6.1 7.0,7.1,7.2,7.3.,8.0,9.0, RH Enterprise, Fedora C1, C2
Posts: 1,216
Rep:
|
blight2c what you need to do, is defragment your hardrive in Windows. What this does is, when you have free space in your hardrive and Windows records something on the hardrive or you delete some files, "holes" of empty space are made in between the date that has not been deleted. So, what defragmenting your hardrive does is to move most of your date and compact everything so that all those "holes" disappear. After your defragment your hardrive, all the date will be at the beginning of the hardrive, so you can feel safe making a partition on what ever free space you have left after the defragmentation. This process takes some time depending on your computer and the size of drive and the amount of data and the time since your last defragmentation, so I suggest you defragment while you are gone to watch a movie, or simple overnight  . Have fun!
 zLinuxz 
|
|
|
|
06-21-2002, 06:02 PM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thanks for the info guys  i ran defrag twice before. after the first, fips informed me that there wasn't a single cylinder avaible, after the second i had around 50 free. so i'll run it again, maybe it's a slow war of attritio?.
now i thought i understood the priciples of defragmenting, but maybe someone can correct me. for what ever reason (?) the computer will save files in seemingly random locations. the defrag will copy, move, then delete these in a more logical fashion, right? so why would defraging repeatedly even be necessary, asuming no new files have been written?
also, is there a common error when running defreg from win95? i turn off everything but systray and explorer, click thorough, and make sure not to even move the mouse until it's done. thanks again for the help 
|
|
|
|
06-21-2002, 08:14 PM
|
#5
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,154
Rep:
|
one thing you may be having a problem with is system files. it won't move them on the disk.
the best thing to do is reload windows first on a new partition that is the size you want. but I guess you are trying to avoid doing that.
|
|
|
|
07-12-2002, 09:52 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Midwest
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 355
Rep:
|
I had a similar problem with fips. Even after defragging
with the Windows(95) defragger, there were some extraneous
fragments positioned well toward the end of the disk.
Luckily I had the Norton Utilities on the disk and I was
able to run Speedisk where I could select to have all
files moved toward the front of the disk. This freed up
all the disk space I needed. Fips then worked fine.
I have read that Partition Magic may be able to do
something similar, but it is unclear.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|