Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi!
I am setting up some shares between two debian sarge boxes, one server and one client. Things were doing well, until I realized I couldn't transfer files from the client to the server. After some experimenting, I figured I could rename/remove dirs and files in the server without problems. Also, I could transfer files smaller than 32k. But when the file was bigger than 32k, the transfer would hang and the program stop responding. From this point, I wasn't able to unmount the share.
After more reading and trying, I found that setting the mount option to only use tcp would solve the problem, but it lowers the performance significantly.
I once ran into a problem like this, but it was on an HPUX client with a Linux server, so this advice may or may not help. What I wound up doing is setting the rsize and wsize to smaller than default values as apparently NFS was choking on larger packets. This will also reduce performance, but perhaps not as much as switching to TCP. Though if performance isn't really critical, using TCP anyway seems to be the recommended course of action, based on what I've read.
Hi btmiller,
Thanks for writing. I tried the suggestion, and ended up finding that, oddily, my system appears to like more the smaller values for both rsize and wsize.
Now I can save files in the server, and using udp. But performance is so so... Iptraf tells me speed is around 450kbytes/s.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.