Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello from a non-network savy person,
This is my first post to this network forum and I really need help..I have downloaded suse 10.0,and for almost a month have not been able to configure
the system to connect to the internet..
I have a wired linksys 4 port router/via cable modem with two boxes on it and with anything but suse 10.0 both boxes work fine..Not a hardware issue..
I tried static IP's but went back to DHCP client.I use the Tulip driver for my NIC chip and have compared all the settings for version 9.2 which connects fine to 10.0 which does not..
The results of "ifstatus eth0" is exactly the same numbers except for two things..
9.2 is as follows:BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen but 10.0 shows NO CARRIER in front of this line..
The "route -v" command also shows a difference as follows..
9.2 which connects = 1 of 1 configured routes for interface eth0 up but 10.0 shows 1of (2)two configurations..
The following numbers(destination,genmask,for link-local and loopback as well as default )are exactly the same....
The DNS numbers are the same as those in the other working systems..
I really do not understand this and thru all my readings cannot solve it..
I need help from someone who can steer me in the right direction so that
10.0 is a useable system..
Thank you for reading this post and any help will be appreciated,
jolphil
Distribution: #1 PCLinuxOS -- for laughs -> Ubuntu, Suse, Mepis
Posts: 315
Rep:
read man pages on ifconfig to see how to start/stop network if.
running
/sbin/ifconfig or /usr/sbin/ifconfig
would show you all the paratmers for the port
ifconfig eth0 up or ifup eth0 will start an interface ..
no carrier in front of the port means that port is not configured.
go you yast and find the hardware setup screen .. I am not using my suse machine so can't be specific .. but yast2 is excellent for starting up the interfaces.
Something very strange happened..While changing eth0 settings in Yast twice now I was able to connect to the internet..The strange part is that it went like lightning to the first website but would not go any where else after that..Just sat there..Even when I rebooted it would not come back on..
Has anyone ever heard of that? I tried both Konqueror and Firefox and neither will go anywhere after the first connect....Can some file be overwritten? I am at a loss..I cant recall what the settings were because after that I changed them again..
Thank You,
jolphil
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.