kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Linux - KernelThis forum is for all discussion relating to the Linux kernel.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Looks like you have a problem with smp (symmetric multiprocessing). You can add the following to the kernel stanza in grub 'nosmp'. Restart and test try again. Your os is being mounted readonly because /etc/fstab is configured to mount it that way when there is a problem.
Looks like you have a problem with smp (symmetric multiprocessing). You can add the following to the kernel stanza in grub 'nosmp'. Restart and test try again. Your os is being mounted readonly because /etc/fstab is configured to mount it that way when there is a problem.
Oke thanks for replying.
i am looking in the /boot/grub/menu.lst so where do i have to put nosmp?
It's a production server so it's a little bit hard to reboot. i will try in the evening and let you know what the result is.
Just to clarify and make sure you know what's happening, the "nosmp" option is disabling symmetric multi-processing. This won't matter if your running one CPU, but if your rocking two or more CPUs (multi-cores included), you'll essentially be limiting your machine to one.
If you're fine with only one CPU, booting with nosmp everytime won't matter (conversely, you should be able to just disable SMP in the kernel config and rebuild the kernel). If you need/want the other CPUs (assuming your hardware actually has other CPUs), you should only be booting this "nosmp" option to test for a while to confirm that smp.c is really the problem (should be according to your error messages). You'll then want to fix the problem (upgrading kernel source and recompiling your kernel should do it) and reboot with smp enabled.
I wasn't sure if you knew the full consequences of this solution, so sorry if I just wasted your time.
Just to clarify and make sure you know what's happening, the "nosmp" option is disabling symmetric multi-processing. This won't matter if your running one CPU, but if your rocking two or more CPUs (multi-cores included), you'll essentially be limiting your machine to one.
If you're fine with only one CPU, booting with nosmp everytime won't matter (conversely, you should be able to just disable SMP in the kernel config and rebuild the kernel). If you need/want the other CPUs (assuming your hardware actually has other CPUs), you should only be booting this "nosmp" option to test for a while to confirm that smp.c is really the problem (should be according to your error messages). You'll then want to fix the problem (upgrading kernel source and recompiling your kernel should do it) and reboot with smp enabled.
I wasn't sure if you knew the full consequences of this solution, so sorry if I just wasted your time.
-TDS-
Wasting my time, i think not!
Great that you are taking the time to explain it to me.
Our server has only 1 cpu and last week i upgraded our kernel but probably with smp enabled.
so thanks for your messages. I am going to test and let you know the results.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.