Weekly Hardware Poll, January 5th: What Chip are you buying next.
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: What Chip would you be buying today?
Weekly Hardware Poll, January 5th: What Chip are you buying next?
Looks like the weekly Hardware Poll turned into the Monthly Hardware Poll. Sorr y about the two missing polls, I was put down with a bad case of Flu followed up by the knockout punch of the Holidays.
We're going to wander back to basics with the fourth installment here.
Every geek I know is always planning their next machine within a few months of building their last one. So, let's talk chips. If you were out to buy today, what would it be? Don't think in the fantasyland of if money was a joke. Really, what would you be buying if you were simply in your normal market? And most imporantly, why?
Okay, I'm a hardware idiot. But I am thinking about a faster processor for the heck of it. Intel and AMD are the only options for me from the above and I hate the idea I'm using today's version of a 286 so I pretend this 64-bit business doesn't exist. Don't see the need for it. Plus all the Palladium crap - and Opteron's on board with that, too, apparently - not just Intel. So that basically leaves me with a faster AMD - Intel's fine by default but if I'm *just* picking a chip on my own, it'd be AMD. I've never had anything but Intel or totally weird stuff, until this box with an AMD and I like it. So a fast Athlon XP. Which my mobo will support, besides.
But I really have no business posting on this thread. It just interested me. Look forward to reading the discussion.
I admit it, I like super pretty pictures to go along with my command line. So I would get a PPC970 machine though the manufacturer of the whole machine would more likely dub it "G5". This would give me an opportunity to run that hyped up MacOSX along side my linux so, as well as get me into a 64-bit environment. That and architecture wise I just think the Power4/PPC970 stuff is a whole lot better then x86/x86-64.
Athlon64.
and mostly, really, honestly, it's because with AMD i can make the move to 64-bit that Intel isn't ready for, and with Linux i can compile my software for it right away, which Microsoft isn't ready for.
i know there are limitations, and lots of reasons why it only makes a small difference, but it's the cutting edge, you know?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.