LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


View Poll Results: What Chip would you be buying today?
Intel Pentium 4 9 25.71%
Intel Xeon 2 5.71%
IBM PPC 2 5.71%
UltraSparc 0 0%
AMD Opteron 2 5.71%
AMD Athlon64 10 28.57%
AMD Athlon XP 7 20.00%
Other 3 8.57%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2004, 01:42 AM   #1
finegan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 72
Weekly Hardware Poll, January 5th: What Chip are you buying next?


Looks like the weekly Hardware Poll turned into the Monthly Hardware Poll. Sorr y about the two missing polls, I was put down with a bad case of Flu followed up by the knockout punch of the Holidays.

We're going to wander back to basics with the fourth installment here.

Every geek I know is always planning their next machine within a few months of building their last one. So, let's talk chips. If you were out to buy today, what would it be? Don't think in the fantasyland of if money was a joke. Really, what would you be buying if you were simply in your normal market? And most imporantly, why?

Cheers,

Finegan

Here's the oldies:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...hreadid=125816
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...hreadid=123603
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...hreadid=121281

Last edited by finegan; 01-05-2004 at 01:46 AM.
 
Old 01-05-2004, 03:35 AM   #2
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Okay, I'm a hardware idiot. But I am thinking about a faster processor for the heck of it. Intel and AMD are the only options for me from the above and I hate the idea I'm using today's version of a 286 so I pretend this 64-bit business doesn't exist. Don't see the need for it. Plus all the Palladium crap - and Opteron's on board with that, too, apparently - not just Intel. So that basically leaves me with a faster AMD - Intel's fine by default but if I'm *just* picking a chip on my own, it'd be AMD. I've never had anything but Intel or totally weird stuff, until this box with an AMD and I like it. So a fast Athlon XP. Which my mobo will support, besides.

But I really have no business posting on this thread. It just interested me. Look forward to reading the discussion.
 
Old 01-05-2004, 04:56 AM   #3
krussell
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: dhaka
Distribution: Slackware 11 (fixed), MEPIS
Posts: 241

Rep: Reputation: 30
i am not going for any CISC prosessor this time. the next processor i buy, it must be a RISC-class.

Last edited by krussell; 01-05-2004 at 04:58 AM.
 
Old 01-06-2004, 04:44 PM   #4
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
And I want something silent & low-watts :}

I'll be getting a Nehemia machine!

And if I had lots and lots of cash - a Dual Opteron ;)


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 01-07-2004, 02:11 PM   #5
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
I admit it, I like super pretty pictures to go along with my command line. So I would get a PPC970 machine though the manufacturer of the whole machine would more likely dub it "G5". This would give me an opportunity to run that hyped up MacOSX along side my linux so, as well as get me into a 64-bit environment. That and architecture wise I just think the Power4/PPC970 stuff is a whole lot better then x86/x86-64.
 
Old 01-12-2004, 07:08 AM   #6
andrewlorien
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: sydney .AU
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Athlon64.
and mostly, really, honestly, it's because with AMD i can make the move to 64-bit that Intel isn't ready for, and with Linux i can compile my software for it right away, which Microsoft isn't ready for.

i know there are limitations, and lots of reasons why it only makes a small difference, but it's the cutting edge, you know?

asdnerw
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weekly Hardware Poll, Dec 14th: What's your favorite notebook? finegan Linux - Hardware 18 12-03-2004 12:31 PM
Pseudo-Weekly Hardware Poll, February 8th: Who cares about x86? finegan Linux - Hardware 20 04-21-2004 10:07 PM
Weekly Hardware Poll, January 12th: How fast do you push data? finegan Linux - Hardware 4 02-05-2004 08:16 PM
Weekly Hardware Poll, Dec 7th: How fast does data move in your house? finegan Linux - Hardware 11 12-14-2003 03:47 PM
Weekly Hardware Poll, Nov 30: Is this your card? finegan Linux - Hardware 18 12-06-2003 09:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration