Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I'm considering buying another external hard drive, but I have a bit of a problem:
I have a desktop running Debian (with WinXP on a secondary hard drive) and I have a MacBook Pro, running, well, Mac OSX.
I'd like the hard drive to be accessible to all of those systems..
My current external hard drive has Ext3, which works wonderfully on Debian, sometimes sort of works in Windows with Virtual Volumes/explore2fs, and doesn't work at all in Leopard.
Can anyone recommend a file system for a terabyte drive (that's likely to store huge files, such as HD videos), which can be accessed by all three major OSs?
It doesn't have to be a builtin one, but so long as it can be installed and used on all three, and is quick (ergo, no FUSE stuff), I'd be happy with it.
This question is of interest to me also... actually, I also have the same problem when dealing with much smaller disks and windows/linux only, as I'd like a modern filesystem that supports POSIX features (more than all, symbolic links, sparse files) and that can be accessed from many OSs.
FAT32 is not a good option because it lacks many features and results in very big clusters even with not-so-big disks... but it seems to be a de-facto standard. Will ZFS be natively supported by most OSs one day? That'd be the solution.
I still haven't found a solution to this problem now... sorry this post does not really help!
Using explore2fs is the old way and EXT2 IFS is the new way in Windows. This will get rid of using virtual volumes that may not work in Mac OS X. It will also get the saying "sometimes works" in Windows to always works. Then install ext2fsx for Mac OS X. From the logs for ex2fsx it is best to mount an EXT2 as read-only to minimize data corruption.
Another way is to setup a file server using a gigabit NIC and a gigabit network. I think either SAMBA or NFS can be used.
Even though ntfs-3g states there are no data corruptions -- yet. ntfs-3g has not been tested for long term use and for very, very big files. Though FAT32 can be used if files are not larger than 4 GB in size. The cluster size should not be able to provide too much slack space unless files are not divisible by the cluster size.
I suggest if you can not find a reliable file system for each OS, setting up a file server to host the files will be your only choice.
Hmm.. I don't really know.. I'd like to be able to use the drive directly on all of the computers, but I guess if that's gonna be a problem.. :/
And I will undoubtably have files way larger than 4GB, so FAT32 is out