What are the Pro's and Con's of Updating From Source
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What are the Pro's and Con's of Updating From Source
I'm a great believer in "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." However, I also believe in having "the latest and greatest." I'm currently running Mandrake 9.2--after moving from RedHat 9.
Are there disadvantages in updating things to new releases when running an older version of the application that was installed as part of the distro?
For example, Mandrake 9.2 natively supports ALSA ver 0.9.6--and has rpm's to support this. However, the current version of ALSA is 1.0.2c. I would like to update, but my sound--Audigy2 Platinum-ex--is working fine. AND I haven't been able to find any rpm's to support the move. I've read the HOWTO's in this forum and I'm thinking that "freshening" up by using the source would be a good idea, but I think I remember reading a caveat somewhere that this isn't a good idea.
I use Slackware-current, keeping it updated using swaret (swaret.org).
I just have to run "swaret --update" and then "swaret --upgrade" every day or so, keeps everything up to date for me. I was able to upgrade to the newest alsa doing that.
Debian's apt-get looks great... I tried to install Debian a week or so ago though, and I eventually gave up. It was just too confusing. The whole thing is so big and complicated YMMV on that though.
Thank you both for your comments and reference links.
I understand the package management process--I think, just got comfortable with Mandrake's urpmi yesterday. I'm looking at "tuning" the packages once they're installed.
Here's a specific example. I installed Mandrake 9.2 about three weeks ago. I have it "up and running" and now I'm "tweaking." I discovered that there are new releases of ALSA, XMMS and KDE. Reading the changelogs tells me that these new versions have features that I like. However, there are no binary packages, which contain these new releases, available yet. I'm asking if anyone knows of any documentation or has personal experience in the pros and cons of "freshening" the packages from the tarballs of these new releases.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.