Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Many of my mates and I are experiencing some major difficulties when attempting to refer to some sources in Linux' implemented documentation.
This is mainly because not every document in Linux can be accessed and/or viewed without a terminal pager program. And therefore, cannot be used in source references. - Or can they? - Of course, they can.
But how to format it properly into an academic document? Or even better! - In citations of format, using any of these citation styles...:
In case it still is a bit fuzzy on what is asked, first of all, I apologize. - Let me clarify it with a theoretical scenario:
The information you wish to refer to can only be accessed and viewed using a terminal pager program and not from anywhere else. Then how do you put this as an accepted source of reference?
Let's say it's iptables. Now it's not very professional to indicate something related to...: "Write the command line "man iptables" in the terminal to be able to view the source".
I hope this made sense. If not, I'd be happy to go even more in-depth to serve you an even better understanding of the issue that we are facing.
Any valuable information, to help solve this thread, will be marked as helpful and get a personal message saying 'thank you' followed by feedback. Apart from lots and lots of gratitude, of course!
Thank You.
On a side-note:
The initial content of this thread was originally posted by myself.
However, the thread was serving another purpose and asked for a different solution than the one stated above does. Also, the original thread completely lacked the necessary information and details to successfully solve it.
To moderator:
If you would flag this as a double-post and then force any of the threads to be removed, then I would kindly ask you to remove the original thread which can be located here. Thank you.
Last edited by Pomerano; 01-28-2018 at 09:08 AM.
Reason: Further details followed with a thank you-note
...
The information you wish to refer to can only be accessed and viewed using a terminal pager program and not from anywhere else. Then how do you put this as an accepted source of reference?
I don't think you're premise is correct. In my experience, any command's man page can be accessed on the 'net, usually on several different servers. The collection at die.net seems fairly complete.
I don't think you're premise is correct. In my experience, any command's man page can be accessed on the 'net, usually on several different servers. The collection at die.net seems fairly complete.
Can you use a URL as your reference?
Yes, certainly. So any man page can actually be found on the web, huh?! - Is there perhaps even a way to search for them through some updated Linux-documentation-search-engine-kind-of-a-deal? (not google). - Reducing the risk of finding ourselves referring to outdated versions with the wrong author?
EDIT: Could this also be the case with whatis and info?
EDIT2: linux.die.net seems very good so far. Do you have any more similar databases to look through??
Yes, certainly. So any man page can actually be found on the web, huh?! - Is there perhaps even a way to search for them through some updated Linux-documentation-search-engine-kind-of-a-deal? (not google). - Reducing the risk of finding ourselves referring to outdated versions with the wrong author?
EDIT: Could this also be the case with whatis and info?
EDIT2: linux.die.net seems very good so far. Do you have any more similar databases to look through??
Thanks! +1
I use duckduckgo to search, but most any search engine will probably find what you want. Have you tried searching for whatis or info documentation? I find several other websites by searching for "linux documentation"
As with any research, it's incumbent upon the researcher to verify/validate the source before using it.
Obviously die.net (which I like a lot) is only one version of the man pages.
The local copy installed on whichever machine you're on is the ONLY one that can be taken to be definitive - as cmds change, so do the man pages ... (hopefully )
IMHO, anyone smart enough to be looking at the src code already knows about the man pages (or should).
Worst case I might add 'see "man iptables" ' if eg it's not obvious that that section of code relates to that specific man page - that should be plenty.
Obviously die.net (which I like a lot) is only one version of the man pages.
The local copy installed on whichever machine you're on is the ONLY one that can be taken to be definitive - as cmds change, so do the man pages ... (hopefully )
IMHO, anyone smart enough to be looking at the src code already knows about the man pages (or should).
Worst case I might add 'see "man iptables" ' if eg it's not obvious that that section of code relates to that specific man page - that should be plenty.
Thank you for your response. :-) As for the request - We solved it by switching to Debian, hehe. https://manpages.debian.org/
My 2nd sentence still stands though ie unless all your specific machines are all locked to the version described by those webpages, there may still be (albeit slight) differences
More so if people are eg running RHEL derived systems ... consider your audience.
Ofc we're splitting hairs here haha.
As I said anyone smart enough to be working at src level should be aware of these issues..
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.