Quote:
Originally Posted by i92guboj
This has nothing to do with the files being binary or anything like that.
In first place, if the tarball was corrupted at all you wouldn't even be able to uncompress it. The files you get when extracting should be 1:1 the same than they were when compressing.
How do you know that the binaries inside the tarball are corrupted at all?? What are the symptoms? Are they binaries for windows or for linux?
|
I would like to agree with you but the binary files put into the archive are fine when added, but after extraction and opening one I get a corrupt file. The binary file I am using to test are images. So I am just trying to open them with an image viewer. Files I tried are .png & .bmp After I extract the archive I binary sftp them back to my windows machine and they are no good.
These files are from a cvsnt repository. Originally all these files were located on a linux cvs server, but due to a failure I moved them to cvsnt thinking that I would just use windows going forward. Well it is a long story but now I am moving them back to a linux cvs server. I am aware of the issues of trying to do this, but we only used the cvsnt server for about 2 months and we did not use any cvsnt specific features so the data should be fine.
Anyway for the life of me I can't figure out why the binary files are corrupt just moving them to linux fs. I guess I could just move a file directly from the windows box to linux box and see if it get corrupted. This would rule out taring as the culprit.