Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i got the same problem, gentoo amd64 2004.2 kern 2.6.7 and im using grub and i get unable to mount root fs kernel panic although my partitions and everything seem correct and filesystem support is built in correctly
Originally posted by DarkNebula After installing gentoo and trying to boot it I get... Kernel panic VFS: unable to mount root fs on 3:04. Here are some things that might help.
It's been almost 3 weeks, and you've probably gotten it fixed now,
but I'd like to ask one question. What type of hard drive do you have,
and how is it being detected? You should see that before the kernel
panic message.
yes
infact there are many people have the same problem witht hte 2.6kernels, the known fix it to issue the minor major block number to root= instead of the /dev method its worked for many ppl however not for me cause on my debian sys i issue ls -l /dev/hda10 and its 3, 10 so thats 0310 so i do root=0310 and it _should_ work but when i boot it says cant load 0310 or hda16 but it sohuld be hda16 but hda10 so just a guess i tried 10-6 0304 and then it said cant load 0304 or hda4 so thats werid and thats why this fix isnt working for me, however go get it working for you http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1955...ts_per_page=35
Originally posted by dmx9595 yes
infact there are many people have the same problem witht hte 2.6kernels, the known fix it to issue the minor major block number to root= instead of the /dev method its worked for many ppl however not for me cause on my debian sys i issue ls -l /dev/hda10 and its 3, 10 so thats 0310 so i do root=0310 and it _should_ work but when i boot it says cant load 0310 or hda16 but it sohuld be hda16 but hda10 so just a guess i tried 10-6 0304 and then it said cant load 0304 or hda4 so thats werid and thats why this fix isnt working for me, however go get it working for you http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1955...ts_per_page=35
No, it says to do it in HEXADECIMAL so 10 becomes 0A, not 10 which is 16 decimal, hence it looks for hda16 when you boot.. The number you want is root=030A
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.