Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's not a stupid question and in fact this doen not even put you in the inquisitive idiot category. (REFERENCE TO A BANNER AD AND BUMPER STICKER. THIS IS NOT A FLAME. I REPEAT THIS IS NOT A FLAME.)
At the risk of oversimplifying an extremely complex issue and being flamed by some kernel guru. - I'll take a shot. As I understand it the kernel is to linux as command.com is to DOS. That is, if DOS could manage permissions, control network deivices and protocols, manaage driver libraries, autoload modules, and so MUCH more.
Oh. and it's distributed under the GPL.
And Mr Torvalds is a very funny guy. I don't think I'd want to go for beers with Mr Gates. I could be wrong. I certainly would not want to hang out with Mr. Ballmer.
I always picture it as this, the kernel is the guy who does all the scenes in the background, communicating with all your hardware with the OS, making sure everything is in check and no one gets out of line. He passes the info from you to the hardware, like an translator.
Oh well, that is how I see Mr. Kernel and his job function.
I like TrickKid's explination. I'd advise you to think of command.com in DOS being akin to the Kernel (barely) and the Shell (bash, tcsh, sh, etc) though. I've heard it said about the kernel "protecting the user from the hardware and the hardware from the user".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.