LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2011, 06:05 PM   #1
serafean
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Distribution: Gentoo, Chakra
Posts: 871
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 103Reputation: 103
Future !X ? Wayland : X - what is wayland?


Hi, I keep hearing about this Wayland display server, for which graphic drivers need to be feature-filled, GUI toolkits have to be modified and X to be marked as deprecated in the long run (maybe not, but I think I did read something along those lines). However, I don't understand what Wayland will bring us that isn't possible with X : Could somebody please clarify for me what Wayland actually is, how it compares to X, and why there is such a fuss around it?

Thanks

Serafean

PS : I did read the FAQ, and I'm not much wiser
 
Old 03-03-2011, 06:09 PM   #2
corp769
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,807

Rep: Reputation: 996Reputation: 996Reputation: 996Reputation: 996Reputation: 996Reputation: 996Reputation: 996Reputation: 996
Here is the link to the wikipedia article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland...erver_protocol)

It is just pretty much an alternative to X, and so far from what I have seen and done with it, it gets a good review from me.

Cheers,

Josh
 
Old 03-03-2011, 07:19 PM   #3
pljvaldez
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Squeeze (x86)
Posts: 6,092

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
My understanding is the the biggest difference is that Wayland drops a lot of "unneeded features" for typical desktop users, which in turn is supposed to make it more responsive for the application space (at least that's the theory). The biggest thing getting dropped is network transparency (i.e. being able to run individual X apps from a remote server via ssh). So right now I can connect to the remote server via ssh and then run just the Ansys gui application from my Windows box via Xming. With Wayland, I would have to "remote desktop" into the server and get an entire desktop like you do in Windows. You couldn't just run a single application over the network without firing up an xserver to also run in parallel with Wayland.

For most desktop users, this is a good step as the underlying guts are optimized for desktop use. For most technical users who ssh to servers to run remote X applications, this is a not so good step - though theoretically you'll be able to run an xserver on the side.

Last edited by pljvaldez; 03-03-2011 at 07:20 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-04-2011, 07:28 AM   #4
serafean
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Distribution: Gentoo, Chakra
Posts: 871
Blog Entries: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 103Reputation: 103
So network X won't be possible. now I'm left wondering how Wayland handles multiple screens (DISPLAY=(0.0|0.1)). Would that functionality be lost? will I be stuck with a xinerama-like configuration? What about multiple pointers? I have two separate X screens, and 2 pointers, effectively emulating a multi-seat setup, would this still be possible with Wayland?
And multiple video cards(no sli/crossfire)? I guess trying it out would answer these questions, but right now the only non-production PC is unsupported by free graphic drivers(=>no Wayland).
.
Serafean
 
Old 03-04-2011, 10:57 AM   #5
pljvaldez
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Squeeze (x86)
Posts: 6,092

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
I'm guessing multi-seat, multi-input, and multi-videocard support would be features of Wayland somewhere down the road since touchscreens need multi-touch, and lots of users have multiple displays and multiple video cards. But like KDE4, I'd bet the initial releases are missing a lot of functionality.
 
Old 03-04-2011, 11:09 AM   #6
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,440

Rep: Reputation: 959Reputation: 959Reputation: 959Reputation: 959Reputation: 959Reputation: 959Reputation: 959Reputation: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by corp769 View Post
It is just pretty much an alternative to X, and so far from what I have seen and done with it, it gets a good review from me.
What have you done with it?
 
  


Reply

Tags
wayland, x.org


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Wayland VS X - Some Perspectives LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-22-2010 10:30 PM
Slackware with wayland or x.org? animeresistance Slackware 10 11-14-2010 02:23 PM
LXer: Two Features Wayland Will Have That X Doesn't LXer Syndicated Linux News 4 11-11-2010 09:58 AM
LXer: Why Wayland is good for the future... LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-08-2010 12:50 PM
LXer: Unity on Wayland LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-05-2010 06:30 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration