LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


View Poll Results: Best for distro base?
Debian 50 40.98%
Slackware 41 33.61%
Gentoo 11 9.02%
LFS 8 6.56%
Other 12 9.84%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-20-2006, 12:39 AM   #46
jcookeman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: 33

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hioushi
You are right, we don't, but like I said (it's only my opinion of course) it's no reason for someone to stop making a new one. In any case, the knowlegde-experience or even friends you can get on the process is reason enough. And if this person/team comes looking for advices or help, we should try to do so, instead of discourage them (I'm not saying you are, I can see you're just puting things clear)
I agree with that statement. There are positive things that can come from such an endeavor. But, let's also agree that you can get the same results by focusing the positive energy with an existing project. A group of people that have a cache of newbie energy can be invaluable to an existing project. The only positive AND PROFITIBLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMUNITY that can come from starting from scratch is R&D. And, I doubt this is the motivation behind this initiative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin of Wonder
Imagine if the guys at Ubuntu decieded they weren't going to make thier own distro because we already had to many.
The guys at Ubuntu had a clear business plan with R&D and plenty of funding to go with it. Furthermore, they are filling a market niche that RedHat abandoned a couple years ago, and they are improving on the release cycle of Debian, which is one of the most proven distributions, with actual long-term support. Of course, Ubuntu feeds back (attempts) changes to Debian. So, even this distro can be seen as a contributor to an already existing Linux initiative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neodonkey
So to clarify my ramblings, my two cents amounts to this:
1. The availability of quality documentation is paramount to a distro's success.
2. The ability to manage all the available software that users can install, along with their configuration files is a daunting task, but one that must be a top priority.
Two good points. However, only a couple distributions have come close to fulfilling #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by samcal
I believe by creating another distro it will help the community, sure its going to ad another choice but that's a good thing in my opinion. By working on this distro and moulding it into the image the team has come up with I will be more motivated to create programs, it will also give me more reason to fund it.
It depends on how you look at it. Sure, can another choice and the R&D that comes from another distro help the community? Absolutely. But, your last statement shows the flaw. You are going to devote a teams time and efforts to a new project that, from what I see, has no clear defined goal other than self-satisfaction. If that's the case, then go create the project in the eyes of the team for your personal satisfaction. However, if you want to create something that is intended to be usable by everyone else, place that time, energy, effort, and money into something existing that can use it. God knows there are plenty to choose from.

I'm not beating you up. Far from it. I'm an Infrastructure Director that runs large, distributed Linux systems. And, I am trying to be critical and skeptical as to what you will do for the Linux community and how that will, in fact, profit for the community. I have been using Linux for several years and am a huge proponent for it in industry. But, Linux has much more limited applications than its main opponent(s).

Oh, and guys, when we start talking about "look at all the distributions," on the other hand we only have one Linux kernel. There has been talk for a long time now about forking to specialized kernels for different applications, but hasn't happened yet.
 
Old 10-20-2006, 02:45 AM   #47
primo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 542

Rep: Reputation: 34
Think about all the features you'd like to see implemented in each distro and consider those that are best implemented in another. A lot of new distros are based on Slackware, but they in turn provide a real package management mechanism (with dependency tracking and so on). I think that the most sensitive issue is that of package management and Debian's apt truly stands out. But I'd prefer if it were easier for me to compile the whole thing from source. I suggest you to look at NetBSD's pkgsrc. (There are about 3 pkgsrc-based distros that are in turn based on Slackware).
 
Old 10-20-2006, 09:09 AM   #48
samcal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 28

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcookeman
You are going to devote a teams time and efforts to a new project that, from what I see, has no clear defined goal other than self-satisfaction.
Far from it, put it this way, if I did not start this project we may have never contributed to the Linux community. We have many goals, the website will be up soon and I'll let you have a read. We know what we want to do and it has little to do with self satisfaction, it has more to do with our passion for Linux and the areas we believe we can improve on. However you would be correct if you where implying we did not want to help another distro because we do not want to, directly. All those guys will know far more than us about what they are doing and it would take us a while to get up to scratch, however this way we know what is going on, where we are and what is to be done, as I see it the production cycle is going to be a lot faster because and there will be less/no piddling around with working things out or fighting about views/ethics. DO NOT GET ME WRONG (heavy emphasis) we are going to give everything back to Debian or Slackware, any improvements we find we will freely report and try to patch, so essentially we will be working with them but on a separate yet similar project

The reason this project started was because I feel in love with Linux one day and I want the world to know about it. Now many people do but the Mac and PC's are too busy to notice or assume it's too hard. In no way are we pulling of a Linspire and making Lin-Dows... that is the last thing we want to do. We are making a distro that is Linux, Desktop Linux, Multimedia Linux, Eye Candy Linux, Secure Linux, Network Linux, Home Linux... It will be something everyone can use keeping in mind traditional Linux fans. This basically means its going to be easy to use, but not everything is going to be done for you, you will be free to do, to change, to recreate, the boundaries will be endless. Now making a distro that is easy to use seems pointless as other claim to do that any way, but we are also going to focus on a few other things... As soon as the site goes up I'll post and let you guys know.
 
Old 10-20-2006, 09:42 AM   #49
jcookeman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: 33
Well, I'm voting for Slackware for the simple fact that 1) it has more frequent releases (but not too many), 2) it is quite simple and therefore offers more room for building (keeping development much less arcane), and 3) is proven extremely reliable for over a decade now.
 
Old 10-20-2006, 03:45 PM   #50
jstephens84
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Nashville
Distribution: Manjaro, RHEL, CentOS
Posts: 2,098

Rep: Reputation: 102Reputation: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by trickykid
Be orginal, don't base it off anything if you want to stand out. What your actually implying to me is there's just going to be another damn distro to choose from. Make it stand out, make it different from the others. Do this by building it truly from scratch, or it's just going to be another cloned distro..

Agreed. we have too many of those based of this distro or that distro. But creating an entirely new one now that is the way to go.
 
Old 10-21-2006, 05:51 AM   #51
jcookeman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: 33
And, there is something called "not reinventing the wheel." Slack and Debian have their roots, also.
 
Old 10-21-2006, 12:39 PM   #52
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
This is a tough one. To reinvent the wheel or not to reinvent the wheel? Personally I don't see a need for it. Look at Gentoo for example. Its Debian based, but I can't really tell. I see very little Debian left in it. The package manager has obviously changed, but even subtle thing have changed as well. The init scripts in Gentoo are totally different. There seems to be no need to reinvent the wheel when given enough time the projects seem to separate so much the similarities fade and the differences emerge.
 
Old 10-22-2006, 01:33 AM   #53
samcal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 28

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin of Wonder
This is a tough one. To reinvent the wheel or not to reinvent the wheel? Personally I don't see a need for it. Look at Gentoo for example. Its Debian based, but I can't really tell. I see very little Debian left in it. The package manager has obviously changed, but even subtle thing have changed as well. The init scripts in Gentoo are totally different. There seems to be no need to reinvent the wheel when given enough time the projects seem to separate so much the similarities fade and the differences emerge.
I agree. It is hard to tell Gentoo is Debian, I was actually amazed when I first found that out. When we make this distro it is not going to just be a face plate for Debian, we plan on changing a large amount of it, even more than Gentoo is the aim.

Another thing to remember is we are not 'reinventing' the wheel, we are trying to improve on it. That is a process that works, if it where not for people trying to make things better we still may be using Fords original Quadricycle. But history shows each time something good is invented people improve on it. That's what we want to do. Reinventing the wheel is pointless, making improvements to it works.
 
Old 11-01-2006, 10:33 AM   #54
silkenphoenixx
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Distribution: Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 16
I'd actually really consider going hard into LFS and once you've got that down pat write some sort of a package manager (perhaps base it on Gentoo's Portage).

Just my not like I'm a linux-god or anything, in fact I'm just basically starting out in the F/OSS world...
 
Old 11-01-2006, 04:26 PM   #55
hendoc
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Conroe, Texas
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid Ibex
Posts: 41
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 15
It's always something with Ubuntu. It won't find USB, or It won't find the soundcard. Always something. It won't boot all the way on AMD but will on my Celeron. I'd rather see a Debian distro. They work everywhere.
 
Old 11-01-2006, 07:03 PM   #56
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by hendoc
It's always something with Ubuntu. It won't find USB, or It won't find the soundcard. Always something. It won't boot all the way on AMD but will on my Celeron. I'd rather see a Debian distro. They work everywhere.
I don't want to burst your bubble but Ubuntu is Debain based.
 
Old 11-02-2006, 01:42 PM   #57
subgenius777
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta,Georgia USA
Distribution: Mandriva 2010
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
hendoc:It's always something with Ubuntu.
You should post that comment in the Ubuntu fanboy annex...oops I meant the Digg Linux/Unix zone. They'd take it like calling their mothers ugly . [As one of the only other Xandros users here I just needed an excuse to say hi.]

But to stay with the topic it's cool to see samcal still getting input/feedback and glad he's sticking with such an ambitious project. Has a name for the new distro been chosen yet? You could start another topic - "vote for the coolest name for my new disto". Best wishes.
 
Old 11-02-2006, 09:16 PM   #58
samcal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 28

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
An update - working with Debian as I type… It’s all going quite well at the moment, have run into a few problems but other than software issues all seems quite well. At most right now it is just a customized Debian, I have not actually started to modify things in detail, well besides configs.

The website (besides some major PHP sections) is almost complete so I can paste a URL back here within the next week or so, right now I’m just trying to fix some exploits I know exist in SMF Forums.

I’ll be posting again soon with those updates so make sure you check back, the website will contain a lot more information

Oh sorry forgot to say - Thanks for all the support + feedback, it's great to know that people are still viewing!! I must head off, the new laptops battery is about to die

Last edited by samcal; 11-02-2006 at 09:19 PM.
 
Old 11-02-2006, 10:27 PM   #59
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
Glad to see things are actually getting off the ground. Don't let the momentum stop. From what I've seen alot of projects die right about at this phase, so don't let your project become a statistic. Please do post the site I'm interested to see what your goals are for the distro and what you've done so far!
 
Old 11-02-2006, 11:43 PM   #60
samcal
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 28

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Everything is starting to pick up now which is great!

We have someone coding some heavy PHP for a program backend
Got a member working on sounds + graphics
Me working on the visuals – (themes and configuration)
And a basic programmer who is working on an installer

However even with this team that is working well together we will need more (this is not an AD) so I might post in the LQ Job Marketplace within the next few months.

What’s great is the actual OS is only phase one of the project
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Distro Base s0no Linux - General 5 10-16-2006 09:56 AM
what should my base distro be? Specialsauce Linux From Scratch 2 01-06-2006 09:18 AM
base gentoo installed, can't boot, need to repair lilo. how? Junior41180 Linux - Distributions 6 11-10-2004 04:45 AM
recent debian distro/base files/ net install ? mvbv-linux Debian 1 01-08-2004 10:15 AM
LILO (mdk base, mounting gentoo) Admiral Yoshi Linux - General 2 11-02-2003 02:46 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration