LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Password
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2005, 04:48 PM   #1
hamish
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Distribution: Server: Gentoo2004; Desktop: Ubuntu
Posts: 720

Rep: Reputation: 30
Software Raid: system requirements


Hello,

I need to RAID a file server in a corporate situation. In the server is a p3 1gz, 1gb of ECC SDRAM RAM and two identical 250gb ide hard drives. Onboard, I have a Fasttrak 100 ATA RAID controller, however, it appears that this doesn't openly support linux.

This file server hosts a number of clients' data and will be hosted in a data center, therefore the Internet connection is the bottleneck, not the speed of my computer. It will probably be receiving between 5GB to 7GB transferred to it during a 12 hour period (ie overnight).

My question is: could my server, with these specs, cope with this level of data transfer?

If not, would a second 1ghz p3 make it better?

Thanks
Hamish

Thanks in advance for your help.
Hamish
 
Old 01-30-2005, 08:41 PM   #2
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 66
I see no reason why not. So long as you have that much network bandwitdh that machine should have no trouble handling the transfer.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 04:56 AM   #3
-X-
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Tx,USA
Distribution: Slackware, Red Hat, CentOS
Posts: 495

Rep: Reputation: 30
Get some monitoring tools so you can watch it. If you use X, get gkrellm, or if you use command line look at iptraf and others, or some here;
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/nmtf/nmtf-tools.html

Look at monitoring your cpu, disks IO, and bandwidth.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 05:12 AM   #4
hamish
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Distribution: Server: Gentoo2004; Desktop: Ubuntu
Posts: 720

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
hey

thanks for your responses. I will do what you suggest.

One last question: I know that it is the CPU which is really pounded with software RAID, but is the RAM used a lot of well, given that the incoming data will need to be stored somewhere temporarily while it is written to both disks? Would adding another 2gb of swap help this?

cheers
hamish

Last edited by hamish; 01-31-2005 at 05:21 AM.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 02:37 PM   #5
-X-
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Tx,USA
Distribution: Slackware, Red Hat, CentOS
Posts: 495

Rep: Reputation: 30
It's going to depend on a lot of things.... hardware cache, harddrive ram, some decent HD controller, etc.... It looks like you have plenty to start with and can make a better decision after you monitor the system.

I have a box with fair amount of system cache, 500mhz/256ram, and 8 meg on each drive. Coping 1gig on the same box used avg 15% CPU with little increase ram usage. Lots of heavy web sites are running 500mhz-1gig CPU.

In your case, the network will be the slowest link. Get the best NIC you can and monitor the results.

As far as RAID goes, some of the "Hardware" RAID cards you buy actually implement software RAID through the CPU. The main thing with software RAID is make sure you have the drives on a seperate bus.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 02:47 PM   #6
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 66
I don't see much value in adding more swap. Knowing how the linux virtual memory system works, I think if your pounding swap with a GB of RAM your in a good bit of trouble or your running a rediculous amount of memory intensive apps on there.

5-7GB over a 12 hour period really isn't that big a deal. If you think about that, its 56 Gbits in 43,200s which means you need to average about 1.33 Mbits/s over that time period if I'm doing my math right (57,344 Mbits/43,200s). That is about 170 KBytes/s transfer. So long as your internet downlink can handle that, I'm quite certain your computer can. In fact, that wouldn't even come close to taxing your local network bandwidth.

Last edited by jtshaw; 01-31-2005 at 02:49 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raid 5 Requirements Harlin Linux - Hardware 4 10-11-2005 04:04 PM
Software RAID System problem Sushy Slackware 2 09-22-2005 08:11 PM
System requirements enano loco Mandriva 2 04-10-2004 09:06 PM
moving system from ide software raid to new box with scsi raid ftumsh Linux - General 0 10-28-2003 10:34 AM
add software raid-1 to existing system hoover93 Linux - Hardware 1 10-07-2003 11:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration