LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2005, 01:20 PM   #1
Ricky2004
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
ubuntu vs fedora?


So, I can't get this: what's the real difference between a Debian based distro and a RPM one?
See, I'm running FC1, and I want to update it. I toyed around with a Ubuntu LiveCD, and liked it a lot. But I'm figuring that what I liked was the GUI, which is Gnome; so if I used Fedora Core 3 with Gnome 2.8, I'd get the same, right? And the software is roughly the same, isn't it? So where's the difference between them?

Thanks,
Ricky2004
 
Old 01-28-2005, 02:11 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,415

Rep: Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968
the only difference is that ones based on apt, one';s based on RPM... you said it yourself. you will be able to do anything in one that you can do in the other....
 
Old 01-28-2005, 02:17 PM   #3
Ricky2004
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 37

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
OK, thanks, so why would anyone choose one over the other?
 
Old 01-28-2005, 02:29 PM   #4
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,415

Rep: Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968
because Debian is for hippies* and Fedora is for newbies?

seriously all down to personal preference.

* has anyone else ever actaully seen a flock of debian developers? very scary.

Last edited by acid_kewpie; 01-28-2005 at 02:31 PM.
 
Old 01-28-2005, 02:36 PM   #5
Ricky2004
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 37

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
OK, thanks!
 
Old 01-28-2005, 05:23 PM   #6
colnago
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
I would go for Ubuntu for the easier DVD integration (just apt-get install libdvdcss). The new hoary beta has a 2.6.10 kernel option that seems to be the best yet.

On the other hand, there is 10x more software for Fedora, so go for that if you need some special apps and don't want to compile yourself.
 
Old 01-28-2005, 05:47 PM   #7
ferrix
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216

Rep: Reputation: 31
I've used both, and while they both work just fine, I prefer Ubuntu. It is smaller (just one CD) and tighter - by default it has *no* ports open to the outside, and it seems to start fewer processes than Fedora. Running pstree on Fedora leaves me puzzled about half of the entries there!
While its true there are TONS of applications for Fedora, what isn't usually mentioned is that to take advantage of that you have to use half a dozen of repositories, some of which don't play well with others! When I installed Fedora Core 2, I enabled every repo I could find - sure, in theory it gave me access to every program imaginable, but in practice it didn't take long for some odd issues to appear. When I came back to Fedora Core 3, I was a lot more restrained - I stick to the official updates, and that's that. Fedora Core 3 has been really stable for me, but I no longer can access all the varied software, which was pretty much the main reason I installed Fedora in the first place!
Now, Ubuntu (and Debian) seem to have a lot better quality control on their repos, and this sort of problems rarely occurs. In any case, Ubuntu repositories are almost as big as Debian itself, so there is rarely any need to look outside (with the exception of mplayer, which I compiled from source rather than using Marillat's repo)
 
Old 01-31-2005, 08:23 AM   #8
Mork
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Visby, Sweden
Distribution: Ubuntu 4.10
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by colnago
On the other hand, there is 10x more software for Fedora, so go for that if you need some special apps and don't want to compile yourself.
If you enable the universe repository (with unsupported packages) you will get 10 000 or so more packages to choose from

As for the original question Fedora and Ubuntu include some different software. Fedora has SELinux which is not in the stock ubuntu-kernels, but in optional test-kernels. For a desktop user the difference is small. It's hard to explain but I like the feel of Ubuntu better.
 
Old 02-05-2005, 11:10 PM   #9
davegod75
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
I tried FC3 but un-installed it the same day. I just don't like how it is put together.

Ubuntu on the other i love. It just seems so clean and smooth. Been running 4.10 for awhile now and can't wait until Hoary becomes final in April/May
 
Old 02-05-2005, 11:40 PM   #10
Dirty_Ink
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Clearwater, FL
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 243

Rep: Reputation: 30
I found that installing software in RPM based distros is harder, true you can get apt4rpm, but then why not just start with a debian based distro anyways, MEPIS, Ubuntu, est.
 
Old 02-05-2005, 11:58 PM   #11
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
If you run Fedora Core and use apt/synaptic, basically your package management system mimics that of Debian/Ubuntu, so there really is no reason for you to switch over unless you need something from Ubuntu that Fedora doesn't have or you just prefer Ubuntu.

Also I don't agree that software installation on RPM distros is harder than Debian based distro's, it was a valid arguement years ago when apt/yum/urpmi and other automatic dependency resolution tools were not available for rpm based distros but apt was available only on Debian. I believe these days they are more on a level playing field.

Last edited by reddazz; 02-06-2005 at 02:24 AM.
 
Old 02-06-2005, 01:47 AM   #12
JSpired
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Slackware, Suse 9.2
Posts: 565

Rep: Reputation: 30
Try them both and see which you prefer. I have both installed on two different machines and each serve their purpose.
 
Old 02-11-2005, 04:00 PM   #13
macewan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 1,055
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 45
http://nerdsyndrome.com/linuxdesktop/index.php

compares the two
 
Old 06-26-2005, 02:16 PM   #14
j_deb
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
AFAIK apt-get is not supported by Fedora core out of the box, and it's not even an option for FC4.

BTW I've expected to find a Fedora 4 add/remove programs feature that handles dependencies better than RH9 or FC1, like prompting to remove packages that will depend on those i want to remove instead of breaking the uninstalation process, or prompting to indicate a source from wich install new packages instead of asking for the CDs every time(I keep the four ISOs on Hard Disk) or getting them off the web like synaptic these where the features that drove me into using Debian based distros in the first place

Last edited by j_deb; 06-26-2005 at 02:17 PM.
 
Old 06-26-2005, 03:45 PM   #15
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,734
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457
PClinuxOS is a great RPM based distro. Synaptic comes installed. Multimedia apps/plugins come installed as well. My main system is Debian and I love apt-get, plus the fact I have access to over 22k packages.

PCLinuxOS is a great newbie distro, the install is very simple. Plus it is bleeding edge. If you want an RPM based distro I suggest giving it a try. I run it on my Dell C600 laptop and it works great.

Not much difference between Synaptic in Debian and PCLinuxOS or any other RPM distro that uses it. Other than maybe the number of apps available and the way dependencies are handled.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trading Fedora for Ubuntu ToofDogger Ubuntu 4 09-04-2005 11:43 PM
Fedora Core / (K)Ubuntu BuckRogers01 Linux - Distributions 1 07-09-2005 04:50 PM
Ubuntu 5.04 vs Fedora Core 4 Tuxman8898 Linux - Distributions 10 07-07-2005 08:25 PM
Fedora blocked out ubuntu. pep411 Fedora - Installation 1 06-27-2005 07:57 AM
installing fedora 3 and ubuntu subzero83 Linux - Newbie 2 02-23-2005 10:51 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration