Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does anyone know if once can use Mandrake 8.2's update option to upgrade an old Corel Linux OS from 2000?
(Currently trying to get Mandrake to work for me on Toshiba Tecra 550CDT, but unsuccessful so far.)
Thanks for any help anyone can give me.
Do you mean you want it to get the packages for Corel, and install those? Kind of like just installing Mandy's Upgrade tool on a corel box, and then going from there?
I don't see why not, as long as you had the supporting libraries/files to install it. Alot of the time it wants files that look like this: 'file.2.4mdk.i586.rpm'. Notice the mdk in the filename, this may cause you some problems if there is something specific in the 'mdk' file that isn't in a regular version of the file.
The best way to find out though, would be to give it a try.
If they had RPM installed, then why wouldn't they be able to? It's sort of graphical front end to a graphical front end (kpackage, or similar) to rpm command line (or at least it would seem to be). So as long as they had the "supporting" files, why wouldn't it work?
I know about the dependencies, and addressed that. But if they had RPM installed wouldn't there be an "rpm" database? In the unlikely even they actually wanted to install it, couldn't they "satisfy" those rpms and it would work?
I guess I am missing something... I understand the RPM thing. But if they have it installed, satisfied ALL dependencies, could they not then have a working program? Or would there be just too many dependencies to be satisfied? Like eventually they'd be installing over half the disc, or more? I see how it would be a "pain" but I don't see how it "would never work".
well you would have an EMPTY database, everything would need upgrading. EVERYTHING. and there would be no easy way to upgrade, you would have to remove the old packages and then install the new ones, which would often be near impossible.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.