Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
emerging by path is broken and may not always work it says but it has always worked for me.
Edit: this is not recomended you are suposed to add the packages to /etc/portage/package.unmask but if there are a lot of dependancys this can be a pain in the ass. so I do this it works for me but your results may vary.
Last edited by johnson_steve; 07-17-2006 at 01:32 AM.
Distribution: Xubuntu 9.10, Gentoo 2.6.27 (AMD64), Darwin 9.0.0 (arm)
Posts: 1,152
Rep:
I don't even know anyone who uses that; why would you? that is something that might cause you more problems then portage when trying to force it. I would suggest learning portage and how to use it on a command line so that when you come across a problem like this you can figure it out; I mean I can think of at least 4 ways to force an emerge: The correct way (with /etc/portage/package.unmask), the old way (with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" this is no longer recommended), my way (by path; not the correct way to do things) and a complete no-no (by messing with /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask; don't ever do this.) I wouldn't know any of this if I had been using a gui front end to avoid learning portage. I think that gui utilities that keep you from understanding what is really going on with your computer are a bad thing; especially in gentoo where you are sort of expected to know your system. but if you insist:
If it's marked ~amd64, you're probably safe to install it. If it's 'missing keyword' or fully masked, then only install it if you like living dangerously.
I prefer /etc/portage/package.keywords for marking ~x86 (or ~amd64) software to be emerged.
Distribution: Xubuntu 9.10, Gentoo 2.6.27 (AMD64), Darwin 9.0.0 (arm)
Posts: 1,152
Rep:
I can see that Matir likes to do things properly, and has yet another way (his is a recommended practice) that I forgot about, but may I ask: Matir do you use porthole, emerge in a terminal or something else?
I use emerge in the terminal. But I'm largely a command-line jockey for system administration. When I introduce people to linux (usually ubuntu) synaptic is a first stop for that. I've never used porthole, but I don't think it would be 'bad' to use it.
Distribution: Xubuntu 9.10, Gentoo 2.6.27 (AMD64), Darwin 9.0.0 (arm)
Posts: 1,152
Rep:
I didn't mean to say it would be bad. just that if it was masked for his arch that it might give him problems, and that I don't know anyone who uses it.
I use emerge in the terminal. But I'm largely a command-line jockey for system administration. When I introduce people to linux (usually ubuntu) synaptic is a first stop for that. I've never used porthole, but I don't think it would be 'bad' to use it.
i'm a command line junk also however emerge on the commandline from personal experiance hasnt been favourable.
EG yesterday i ran
emerge kdebase
today it didnt install konsole
emerge konsole
results in kdebase-konsole conflicts with kdebase
You need to either install the monolithic kde package, or install the split ebuilds. If you install the monolithic (such as kdebase) then you won't be able to install the seperate programs that you want/need by themselves.
That link will explain it all. You can't install monolithic packages with split packages, it will cause blockages everywhere. Essentially, you should have installed kdebase-meta instead of just kdebase.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.