LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2010, 01:25 PM   #1
TheStarLion
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 472

Rep: Reputation: 41
Compiz and other window managers


Now, I know that both Gnome and KDE have what you could call a high level of integration between Compiz and Kwin (Or whatever it's called now) and Metacity, and both can have Compiz replace Kwin/Metacity with Emerald.

However, given that I've never got on well with KDE (And for reasons of avoiding a flame war, I won't go into why for now) and Gnome has started to get a somewhat clunky feel to me, I'm starting to look elsewhere. The problem is, the moment I look elsewhere, it seems like Compiz isn't interested any more.

For example, one of the possibile alternatives to a full Gnome/KDE session I often use is an Openbox session. Why can I not have Compiz work with that, and keep the Openbox WM style, like Compiz without Emerald uses the Metacity style?

Of course, there are other WMs I'm thinking of trying, such as LXDE and Enlightenment, and again, the same question with that - why not allow Compiz to inherit the window style from whatever WM is running, and also allow for it's effects, without having to use a full Gnome or KDE session or have to use Emerald?
 
Old 03-07-2010, 02:23 PM   #2
MS3FGX
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
Because not all of them have seperate window manager and panel components. For example simplistic window managers like FluxBox and Enlightenment integrate all of their functions (drawing windows, presenting the UI, etc) into one single binary, so there is no window manager to replace.

Larger environments like KDE, GNOME, and XFCE are made up of many smaller processes so that some of them can be stopped or replaced without killing the whole system.
 
Old 03-07-2010, 03:30 PM   #3
penguiniator
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Olympia, WA
Distribution: SolydK
Posts: 442
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 60
KDE, GNOME, LXDE and XFCE are desktop environments. They have API's and additional services. They also include a default window manager, which can be replaced. Openbox, Fluxbox, Windowmaker, IceWM, etc. are window managers that can replace the default window manager in any of those desktop environments. Compiz is also a window manager and was designed specifically for that purpose. It would not be possible to "replace" Openbox's window manager with Compiz.
 
  


Reply

Tags
desktop environment, windowmanager


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Window Managers lokirulez Linux - Software 11 07-02-2006 05:34 PM
Window Managers vs Window Shell Environments DJOtaku Linux - General 7 08-09-2005 12:43 PM
Window Managers vs. Desktop Managers mikeshn Linux - General 4 02-11-2004 11:31 AM
Window Managers? lhiggins Linux - Newbie 5 01-12-2004 11:11 AM
Window Managers floyd Linux - General 31 04-26-2003 12:18 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration