GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Bush seemed so unprepared in the debate. He didnt articulate his speech at all. He did point out Kerry's inconsistency on his stance on the war but Kerry kept point back that he made a bad decision.
Originally posted by rjcrews me! also trying to figure out why there is a xerox folder in xp and noone knows why it is there.
i saw that too. there is a "panther" folder in longhorn maybe they just rip the source code right out?
ya, frankly, bush looks pretty stupid up there.regardless of who you like better, its obvious kerry is the better speaker on there. although a lot of it could be to "i would have," while he knew the consequenses whereas bush didnt have a crystal ball. but it dosent take a genious, or a crystal ball for that matter, to figure out that bush made some pretty stupid decisions htese past four years. the biggest of which is running for president in the first place. im not compleltly pro-democratic, anti-republican, but bush and his cabinet are the cream of the crap. the reps could have made better choices for president IMO.
i watched it on fox(direct tv)? i also chk every channel bc i like to see the same thing on different channels but they all look a little different. havent figured that out yet.
the analysis on the various channels is better than the debate itself, the rules water it down and they didnt let nader in to make it interesting. it was great when they let perot in 12 years ago.
the analysis on the various channels is better than the debate itself
i wonder why some channels didn't allow split screen shots of the candidates while they were speaking...and don't tell me it's because they don't want the people to be "distracted" while they watch their future leaders respond to highly charged topics.
Bush seemed so unprepared in the debate. He didnt articulate his speech at all.
That's pretty much the case with him in any unscripted speech. Truly, this man is not president material. I wouldn't even want him for middle management in a department store.
what is bush? what is kerry?
how can I install these features? tar.gz or rpm?
where can I get them?
unfortunately, they are not included in my distro :-(
Originally posted by mhollstein what is bush? what is kerry?
how can I install these features? tar.gz or rpm?
where can I get them?
unfortunately, they are not included in my distro :-(
You must be living in a world of penguins, not humans!!!
Take a break from all that hard work and chill out for a while... without computers...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.